Bid to prevent no-deal Brexit gathers steam among British lawmakers

An amendment proposed by a British lawmaker, which is likely to be supported by the Labour Party and a handful of Conservative MPs, could prevent the disastrous scenario of a no-deal Brexit.

Mark Duffy/UK Parliament/Reuters
British Prime Minister Theresa May attends a confidence vote debate after Parliament rejected her Brexit deal, in London, Britain, Jan. 16, 2019. An amendment proposed by Labour's Yvette Cooper is shoring up support among lawmakers to help prevent a no-deal Brexit.

An attempt by British lawmakers to prevent a no-deal Brexit was gaining momentum on Wednesday after the opposition Labour Party said it was highly likely to throw its parliamentary weight behind the bid.

The United Kingdom, facing the deepest political crisis since World War II, is due to leave the European Union at 6p.m. ET on Mar. 29 but has no approved deal on how the divorce will take place.

Prime Minister Theresa May is battling to break the deadlock after last week's crushing defeat of her two-year attempt to forge an orderly divorce raised the prospect of an exit without a deal.

In a step that could overturn centuries of constitutional convention, some lawmakers are trying to grab control of Brexit from the government in an attempt to prevent what they say would be an economically disastrous no-deal departure.

Labour is likely to back one such attempt, an amendment proposed by Labour lawmaker Yvette Cooper that could result in Ms. May being given until Feb. 26 to get a deal approved by parliament or face lawmakers voting on delaying Brexit.

John McDonnell, the second most powerful figure in the party, told the BBC the amendment was sensible and that Labour was "highly likely" to back it. At least nine Conservative lawmakers have also publicly said they will support it, suggesting that it has a good chance of passing.

Sterling strengthened 0.5 percent against the dollar to $1.3024, the highest level since mid-November, on a view that a no-deal Brexit can be avoided if parliament exerts greater control over the process.

As the United Kingdom's tortuous two-and-a-half year crisis over European Union membership approaches its finale, the possible outcomes for the world's fifth largest economy still include a no-deal Brexit, a last-minute deal, a delay or a snap election.

London calling? 

But the EU, whose members are also worried by the prospect of a disorderly Brexit that would cost jobs in major economies such as Germany, cautioned that no-deal was still the default scenario until London proposed something else.

"Preparing for a no-deal scenario is more important now than ever, even though I still hope that we can avoid this scenario," EU Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier told a gathering of employers and labor organizations in Brussels.

"Opposing no-deal will not stop no-deal from happening," he said, adding it would be necessary for the British to find a majority in favor of another solution to a disorderly exit.

Europe's most powerful leader, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, said she wanted an orderly Brexit but that it was in London's hands.

May has said thwarting Brexit would threaten social cohesion because it would undermine faith in British democracy, while police have said the "febrile" atmosphere could be exploited by far-right extremists.

Another alternative is that May gets enough concessions from the EU to win over rebels in her Conservative Party as well as the Northern Irish party that props up her minority government.

Some have indicated they could be won over if May manages to secure concessions on the so-called Northern Irish backstop, an insurance policy to keep the border open between the British province and Ireland if a future trade deal falls short.

Delayed Brexit

Parliament will vote on Jan. 29 on different options put forward by lawmakers, potentially opening a way out of the stalemate.

A Labour spokesman said the party would "look at all mechanisms to take no deal off the table and to give parliament more of a say in this process" and that leader Jeremy Corbyn was meeting Ms. Cooper on Wednesday to discuss the amendment.

If the Cooper amendment is passed, it would effectively give parliament the power to set May a deadline of Feb. 26 to get a deal through parliament.

If May fails, parliament would be given a vote on asking the EU for a postponement of the Article 50 deadline to prevent Britain leaving without a deal on Mar. 29. It proposes a nine-month extension, to Dec. 31.

May told parliament the move would not solve the issue of the impasse in parliament over the way forward.

"What we have seen is amendments seeking to engineer a situation where Article 50 is extended – that does not solve the issue, there will always be a point of decision. The decision remains the same: no deal, a deal or no Brexit," she said.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Bid to prevent no-deal Brexit gathers steam among British lawmakers
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2019/0123/Bid-to-prevent-no-deal-Brexit-gathers-steam-among-British-lawmakers
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe