Mother to challenge Northern Ireland's abortion laws in court

A woman who bought abortion pills for her teenage daughter in 2013 faces up to five years in prison after her doctor reported the case to the police. But she is choosing to challenge her prosecution in an attempt to reform the country's strict anti-abortion laws.

Clodagh Kilcoyne
People celebrate the removal of Ireland's abortion ban in May 2018 following a referendum vote on the issue. Northern Ireland has yet to remove a similar ban.

A mother who bought abortion pills for her teenage daughter will on Nov. 6 challenge a decision to prosecute her, in the latest effort to reform Northern Ireland's restrictive laws.

The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was charged with two counts of unlawfully procuring and supplying abortion pills in 2013 and faces up to five years in prison.

"This woman has done nothing wrong and yet our laws treat her as a criminal," said Amnesty International's Northern Ireland campaign manager Grainne Teggart in a statement.

"We hope the judges consider this case and its implications very carefully, and listen to the women, politicians, medical practitioners, and lawyers who are all calling for an end to this cruel and outdated law."

Amnesty said the court hearing on Nov. 6 in Belfast marked the first time a prosecution under Northern Ireland's abortion law had been challenged.

Abortion is permitted in Northern Ireland only if a woman's life is in danger or there is a long-term or permanent risk to her mental or physical health. It is not allowed in cases of rape, incest, or fatal fetal abnormality.

Northern Ireland is the only part of Britain or Ireland with such a restrictive regime, after voters in the Irish republic backed the removal of a ban in a landslide May vote that sparked calls for change in the North.

About 1,000 Northern Irish women travel to England each year to have an abortion, while others risk prosecution by self-medicating with abortion pills. 

The woman involved in the case bought the abortion pills at the request of her then 15-year-old daughter, who had been in a physically and mentally abusive relationship, according to Amnesty, which is supporting the family.

The mother later shared details with her doctor, who reported her to police, it said.

Britain's Supreme Court ruled in June the law was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, although it dismissed the case on a technicality because it was not brought by a person who was directly affected.

The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission, which initiated the earlier Supreme Court case, is also involved in the challenge to the mother's prosecution.

"Women and girls continue to face being criminalized in what should be solely a healthcare matter," Chief Commissioner Les Allamby told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in an emailed statement.

"We are supportive of the growing public and parliamentary momentum calling for change on this issue."

Pro-choice campaigners have called for the British government to pass laws liberalizing abortion in Northern Ireland, after the devolved administration in Belfast collapsed in January 2017.

However, Prime Minister Theresa May has declined to intervene, saying any decision should be taken by authorities in Northern Ireland.

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Mother to challenge Northern Ireland's abortion laws in court
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today