Darko Vojinovic/AP
Hungarian police officers open a door to a container where migrants are registered as they enter Hungary, near Horgos, Serbia, on Tuesday. Hungary has declared a state of emergency in two of its southern counties bordering Serbia because of the migration crisis, giving special powers to police and other authorities.

Hungary rejecting asylum seekers – after 10-minute interviews

Refugees say Hungarian police are 'deciding' asylum applications – a process that takes days in most countries – in minutes. Most are rejected.

When Hungary sealed off its border this week to the thousands of refugees seeking to make their way to northern Europe, it left them one option to enter the country – theoretically.

That way is through a small door in the new steel-and-razor-wire fence on the border with Serbia, just west of the barriers blocking the main border crossing, where thousands of refugees are gathered. The crossing is a gateway into Hungary, an EU member country that is a signatory of a treaty that allows free movement within in the bloc. 

But while Hungary says it created special zones like this for refugees to apply for asylum there, it is seemingly rejecting most such requests. On paper, Hungary is following international law; in reality it is turning refugees away without properly adjudicating their claims.

Zaher Habbal, an electrician from Damascus, went through the door Tuesday to apply for asylum. Mr. Habbal said police fingerprinted him and gave him a ten-minute interview, asking mostly biographical questions, before quickly rejecting his application. “Police said to me, ‘Go to Syria. My home is Hungary, yours is in Syria. Go back there,’” says Habbal.

Habbal left Syria two years ago. The regime jailed and tortured him, he says, after he joined demonstrations against it and helped people displaced by the war. If he went back to Syria, says Habbal, he would face more jail time and torture. The Hungarian police officer told him “that’s not my problem,” according to Habbal.

“I said the most important thing is that I find a safe place, whether in Hungary or Germany,” says Habbal. Instead, police gave him deportation orders – written in Hungarian, a language he can't read – and pushed him out the gate and back into Serbia. “I don’t know what to do now," he laments. 

He was not the only one rejected. Many men said they tried to apply for asylum but were told that only families could enter to lodge their requests.

One young man who did manage to make it into the zone, Abdullah Mohamed Arman, from Bangladesh, said his interview was also short. The police did not ask him why he fled Bangladesh, he says, before telling him he was rejected. Mr. Arman says he told police he didn’t want to stay in Hungary but wanted to go to Austria.

Most migrants do not want to stay in Hungary, but prefer to head onwards to more welcoming countries in wealthy northern Europe. Many are also afraid that if they apply for asylum in Hungary, they will be obliged to settle there because of EU rules.

Todor Gardos, a campaigner for Amnesty International who was interviewing those rejected at the border today, said it appeared the Hungarian officials were not conducting detailed interviews to ascertain whether applicants had legitimate asylum claims. Some people were allowed to enter Hungary to process their applications, but he said they appeared to be only very vulnerable people.

Hungary says it now considers Serbia a safe country and therefore refugees there do not have valid asylum claims. Yet Mr. Gardos says Amnesty’s research shows that most refugees are not able to access asylum protection in Serbia – there are excessive waits for processing applications and only a handful of cases have been granted.

He says it’s also problematic that Hungary is giving asylum seekers paperwork only in Hungarian, and that it has in effect made it impossible for refugees to appeal rejections.

Hungarian government officials did not respond to several requests for comment.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Hungary rejecting asylum seekers – after 10-minute interviews
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today