Behind huge Hong Kong march, a dramatic show of public support

Ann Scott Tyson/The Christian Science Monitor
At the biggest pro-democracy protest since June, protesters show the palms of their hands as they call on the government Dec. 8, 2019, to meet all five of their key demands, including universal suffrage and an independent investigation of police.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

As Hong Kong’s pro-democracy protests hit the six-month mark, hundreds of thousands turned out on Sunday in an overwhelmingly peaceful march – one of the biggest since June. One reason for the movement’s strong momentum is that about 70% of the territory’s 7.4 million people support it. Another factor is the movement’s ethic of unity and its embrace of a range of approaches – from nonviolent to more militant – to achieve common aims.

Most Hong Kong people believe a combination of peaceful and radical tactics will achieve the best outcome, and this was reflected in Sunday’s march, as families and retirees carrying umbrellas as parasols joined black-clad student protesters wearing gas masks. Police stayed largely in the background at the protest, as the sea of people filled to overflowing the main road from Victoria Park in Causeway Bay to Central, Hong Kong’s financial center.

Civil servants who oppose what they view as the government’s uncompromising stance joined the march, as did many other residents who felt comfortable attending because the march was approved by police. “I’m not afraid of violence, but if it’s illegal we have fears of being arrested, even months later,” says an art teacher who identified himself only as Mr. T.

Why We Wrote This

The passage of time and outbursts of violence can upend any protest movement. But Hong Kongers have been able to sustain a remarkable sense of unity around their pro-democracy demands.

Hundreds of thousands of protesters staged one of Hong Kong’s biggest marches since June on Sunday, in a dramatic sign of the strength of public support for the six-month-old campaign for greater democracy and autonomy from China.

The overwhelmingly peaceful protest was approved by police and saw an estimated 800,000 people surge through downtown Hong Kong, according to the organizer, the Civil Human Rights Front, the territory’s biggest pro-democracy group. The group also led marches of an estimated 1 million and 2 million people in June that helped push Hong Kong’s government to withdraw a controversial China extradition bill. Police estimated Sunday’s crowd to be much smaller, at 183,000.

Chanting “Five Demands, Not One Less,” protesters of all ages and walks of life raised their outstretched palms as the vast crowd spilled out of Victoria Park and slowly flowed down Hennessy Road and Queensway into Central, the heart of Hong Kong’s financial district. Parents carrying children and retirees holding umbrellas like parasols against the sun joined black-clad students wearing gas masks, as the nonviolent and more radical elements of protesters joined forces in a striking display of unity that analysts say is the hallmark of the movement.

Why We Wrote This

The passage of time and outbursts of violence can upend any protest movement. But Hong Kongers have been able to sustain a remarkable sense of unity around their pro-democracy demands.

“There is an ethic of solidarity … that encourages people to stay united,” says Francis Lee, director of the School of Journalism at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, one of a team of scholars surveying public opinion on the protests. Indeed, using protest art, banners, and chants, the crowd on Sunday articulated slogans that stressed their strong bonds.

“No derision. No division. No denunciation,” read one poster on display along the march route. “Contributing in our own ways, we traverse toward the same summit as one,” it said, showing a protester waving others onward and upward.

Ann Scott Tyson/The Christian Science Monitor
As many as 800,000 people participated in a peaceful march Dec. 8 down a major road on Hong Kong Island.

Polls show that about 70% of Hong Kong’s 7.4 million people are in favor of the pro-autonomy movement, according to Professor Lee’s research. The movement has lessened the gaps in political views between Hong Kong’s moderate, pro-democracy, and localist supporters, but has heightened polarization between those groups and the pro-establishment camp, which favors closer ties with Beijing, he says.

About 89% of Hong Kongers now believe that a combination of peaceful protests and radical tactics can achieve the best outcome, while 92% think that radical actions are understandable “when the government fails to listen,” a mid-September poll shows.

Protesters on Sunday included civil servants, teachers, and other professionals, who voiced deep disdain for how Hong Kong’s government, led by Chief Executive Carrie Lam, has handled the political crisis. Posters mocking Mrs. Lam are mainstays of the protests, as her popularity has fallen to a record low.

“I work for the government, but I don’t agree with the government,” said one middle-aged civil servant as he marched through the financial district, requesting anonymity because of his position.

One of the protesters’ main demands is to elect Hong Kong’s chief executive by universal suffrage, instead of through the current, Beijing-controlled selection process. Some 81% of people polled in October said they seek political reforms. Mrs. Lam is viewed as beholden to Beijing, and prominent posters on Sunday depicted her in the embrace of Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

While Mrs. Lam has not achieved a political resolution to the crisis, she has ordered Hong Kong’s 30,000-strong police force to quell the unrest, leading to more than 6,000 arrests, the heavy use of tear gas and rubber bullets, and a few instances of firing live ammunition. Protesters have hurled Molotov cocktails, bricks, and arrows at police.

Yet despite an escalation of violence on both sides, polls show the majority of people blame the government and police, not the protesters. Trust in the police has dropped sharply since May, and more than half of Hong Kongers have “zero” confidence in the force, a November survey shows.

“Hong Kong people are really tough,” says Brian Fong, a political scientist and former government official. “Despite the fact that over 6,000 have been arrested, and many have been persecuted, Hong Kong people still fight back. The momentum of the movement is still very strong,” he says.

Sunday’s mass protest unfolded largely without police presence or interference, apart from some tensions toward the end. Some marchers said they felt safe to attend because police approved the demonstration. “Because today is legal most people will come out,” says a teacher who identified himself only as Mr. T. “I’m not afraid of violence, but if it’s illegal we have fears of being arrested, even months later.”

Some protesters shed their masks for the rally, and seemed less worried about being photographed. At one point, they enthusiastically responded as a young girl with a loudspeaker led the sea of marchers in chanting: “Fight for freedom! Stand with Hong Kong!” As darkness fell, they lit the way with thousands of cellphone lights and sang Hong Kong’s unofficial anthem, “Glory to Hong Kong.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Behind huge Hong Kong march, a dramatic show of public support
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today