Japan's emperor – unlike Prime Minister Abe – apologizes for WWII

Japanese Emperor Akihito expressed his 'deep remorse' on Saturday, a subtle rebuke of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, whose remarks included sadness but no apology.

Toru Hanai/Reuters
Japan's Emperor Akihito (r.) and Empress Michiko attend a memorial service ceremony marking the 70th anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War Two at Budokan Hall in Tokyo August 15, 2015.

Japanese Emperor Akihito marked the 70th anniversary of the end of World War Two with an expression of "deep remorse" over the conflict on Saturday, in a departure from his annual script which could be seen as a subtle rebuke of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

Abe on Friday expressed "utmost grief," but said future generations should not have to keep apologizing for the mistakes of the past. He offered no fresh apology of his own, noted the Christian Science Monitor's Justin McCurry.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe did as many had predicted, expressing “profound grief” over the loss of life and “sincere condolences” to the victims.

But sorry, it seemed, was still the hardest word.... Realistically, it was about as far as a conservative leader like Abe could go without alienating his domestic power base.

The octogenarian emperor went further.

"Reflecting on our past and bearing in mind the feelings of deep remorse over the last war, I earnestly hope that the ravages of war will never be repeated," Akihito said at a memorial service on the anniversary of the day his father, Hirohito, announced Japan's defeat. Akihito took power in 1990.

"Together with all of our people, I now pay my heartfelt tribute to all those who lost their lives in the war, both on the battlefields and elsewhere, and pray for world peace and for the continuing development of our country."

The legacy of the war still haunts relations with China, North Korea, and South Korea, which suffered under Japan's sometimes brutal occupation and colonial rule before Tokyo's defeat in 1945.

The soft-spoken Akihito has often urged Japan not to forget the suffering of the war and tried to promote reconciliation with Asian countries. He visited Japan in 1992, two years after becoming emperor. At his welcoming banquet, reported the Monitor's Sheila Tefft, "Emperor Akihito stopped short of the formal apology that many Chinese had hoped for, expressing only 'deep sorrow' for China's suffering."

His more explicit apology on Saturday has attracted increased attention at a time when Abe appears to be pushing for a less apologetic tone towards Japan's past.

Akihito had expressed remorse before, but not at the annual service. The constitution bans the emperor from any political role, so his remarks need to be carefully nuanced.

On Saturday, Abe sent a ritual cash offering to Yasukuni Shrine for war dead but did not visit the shrine, seen in China and South Korea as a symbol of Tokyo's wartime militarism.

While Abe, who has said he wants to repair ties with China and South Korea, did not visit Yasukuni in person, three of his cabinet ministers did along with the LDP's policy chief, Tomomi Inada, and scores of other conservative lawmakers.

"Honor and dignity"

Such visits outrage China and South Korea because the shrine honors 14 Japanese leaders who were convicted as war criminals by an Allied tribunal, along with war dead. Abe has not visited in person since December 2013.

China's Foreign Ministry said that Saturday's visit "reflects Japan's seriously wrong attitude to historical issues," while protesters at a Seoul rally burnt pictures of Abe.

Abe's Friday remarks, which fit the narrative of critics who see Abe as a revisionist downplaying the dark chapters of Japan's wartime past, received mixed reviews abroad.

Tokyo's close ally the United States welcomed Abe's commitment to uphold apologies made in the past.

The United States approves of Abe's plans to play a greater security role in Asia in the face of a rising China, but also wants a lessening of tensions over history.

China said that Japan should apologize sincerely to countries that suffered from its military aggression and urged Japan to "take concrete actions to gain the trust of its Asian neighbors and the global community."

South Korean President Park Geun-hye said Seoul was focused on Abe's decision to uphold previous cabinets' understanding of history, but added that the speech contained "regrettable elements." She said she hoped Japan "soon and properly" resolved issues regarding women's "honor and dignity."

Abe on Friday said Japan should "never forget that there were women behind the battlefields whose honor and dignity were severely injured." But he made no direct reference to "comfort women," a euphemism for the girls and women – many of them Korean – forced into prostitution at Japanese military brothels.

Tokyo and Seoul have long been at odds over the issue of comfort women, with South Korea saying Japan has not done enough to atone for their suffering despite a 1993 apology.

North Korea condemned what it called an attempt by Japanese "rightist conservatives to conceal its crime-woven past." The isolationist nation also stepped backwards in time by 30 minutes on Saturday, officially shedding the time zone bestowed upon North Korea by Japan decades ago.

Abe's conservative supporters are keen for Japan to put an end to what they see as a humiliating cycle of apologies, a sentiment he echoed in his remarks

As he said in perhaps the most pointed sentence in the entire statement: “In Japan, the postwar generations now exceed 80 percent of its population. We must not let our children, grandchildren, and even further generations to come, who have nothing to do with that war, be predestined to apologize.” 

"We need to terminate (the cycle of apology) for our grandchildren and the grandchildren's grandchildren," said a 64-year-old man visiting Yasukuni.

(Additional reporting by Ju-Min Park in Seoul, Engen Tham in Beijing and Elaine Lies in Tokyo.; Writing by Linda Sieg; Editing by William Mallard and Nick Macfie)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.