Beijing critic ousted by Peking University

Xia Yeliang, an outspoken government critic was dismissed from his teaching job at China's top university last month.

Kyodo/AP
Xia Yeliang points at a notice from Peking University Oct. 21 that says he has been dismissed.

The reasons for which Xia Yeliang, an outspoken government critic, was dismissed in October from his job teaching economics at China's most prestigious seat of learning, Peking University, are disputed. (See accompanying article.)

He says he was sacked on political grounds, that he is being punished for his public criticism of senior figures in the ruling Communist Party.

The university insists his contract is not being renewed "for no other reasons than academic ones," saying he is a poor teacher with a thin publications record.

Professor Xia is a well-known liberal economist who has been in trouble with the authorities before – especially since he put his signature to Charter 08, a public call for democracy, whose main author, Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo, is serving an 11-year jail sentence for his pains.

Xia has also used "weibo," a social media platform, to post barbed attacks on the government.

Faculty at Peking University's School of Economics voted 30 to 3 not to renew his contract at the end of this year at a meeting Oct. 11. When the decision drew international criticism, the university spokesman told the state-run news agency Xinhua that students had rated Xia the worst professor in the department three times, and near the bottom three other semesters.

Xia disputes this, saying he had been shown only one set of student evaluations (which he acknowledges did rank him at the bottom) and that he does not believe the university's account, though he thinks it's possible that very poor marks from Communist Party loyalists in his classes might have pulled his averages down.

He also says that if this were the real reason for his sacking, he would be the first Peking University professor to have been dismissed on the basis of student evaluations.

Xia also challenges the university's claim that he had published only one paper in a qualified peer-reviewed academic publication in the past five years, saying that he had published five or six such articles.

Xia says he has received no offers for a teaching post elsewhere.

"Not a single university will dare offer me a job," he says. "If this were an academic matter, maybe I am not qualified to teach at Peking University, the best in the country, but am I not qualified to teach at any of the 2,000 universities in China?"

Wellesley College in Wellesley, Mass., where more than 130 faculty members protested on Xia's behalf to Peking University before the Oct. 11 vote, may come to his rescue. Wellesley President Kim Bottomly has approved a proposal that Xia come to the college on a two-year fellowship as a "scholar at risk" under the college's "Freedom Project."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.