When Olympic spectators opt for 'slum tourism,' who benefits?

While slum tourism is arguably exploitive, some say it brings a welcome economic boost to impoverished neighborhoods.

Silvia Izquierdo/AP
Residents move about the slum 'Cidade de Deus,' or City of God, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on July 22.

While in Rio de Janeiro for the Olympics, some tourists are choosing to look beyond the sheen of the games downtown to see harder-to-reach parts of the city.

In what has come to be known as “slum tourism,” some have opted to stay in the impoverished favelas that stretch across Rio’s hills, a world unto themselves, physically and economically separated from the rest of the city.

For 20 euros (about $22 US) per night each, four French tourists opted to stay in a small hostel in Babilonia, a favela overlooking Rio. “It's a little small for four, but there's a bunk-bed on each side,” said one of the tourists to France24.

The bright colors and energy of the neighborhood came as a surprise, said the tourists. “We were expecting something more run-down, less colorful. This feels joyful,” one of them said.

While slum tourism, now popular in places including South Africa, India, and the United States (Detroit), is arguably exploitive, some say it brings a welcome economic boost to these neighborhoods.

“If a client from my hostel takes a motorcycle taxi, it generates a profit for the driver who goes and has a burger at the restaurant down the street. In the end it helps keep the local economy going. It's a virtuous cycle,” favela hostel owner Eduardo Figueiredo told France24.

Roughly a quarter of Rio’s six million residents live in favelas. They hoped that the $12 billion spent on the Olympics would improve living conditions for the poor of Rio, who, as The Christian Science Monitor has reported, are often “ignored, or – worse – hidden from view when Rio hosts lavish global events.”

Promises of sweeping upgrades to the favelas, including better sewage, paved roads, plazas, and social service centers, so far have not materialized, say some locals.

“The [Olympic Games] investment has exacerbated inequality,” Leonardo Soares dos Santos, a historian at Fluminense Federal University, told the Monitor. “It has not been distributed evenly, which is Rio’s historic problem.”

Rio’s mayor, Eduardo Paes, denies that Rio’s Olympic investment has been diverted from the poorer parts of the city to the wealthy ones.

“It’s crazy to say there is no investment in poor areas,” he told The Guardian last month. “If people say this, they don’t know the geography [of the city].”

He told The Guardian that, for now, he feels positive about hosting the Olympics, which have boosted the local economy in the midst of a serious recession.

“Things are happening because of the Olympics,” Mr. Paes told the Guardian. “Even in a time of crisis we keep pushing. We are inaugurating things almost every week.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.