In S. Sudan, churches struggle to keep role as trusted peacemakers

South Sudan's civil war recently entered its second year. Unlike in past wars, church leaders here are having an increasingly hard time participating in peace talks and mediation.

Jason Patinkin
Catholic Archbishop Bishop Paride Taban leads mass on November 9 in an airplane hangar at the UN's Jebel displaced person's camp outside Juba where thousands of ethnic Nuer have taken shelter from the war.

Wearing an immaculate white cassock, Catholic Bishop Paride Taban strides through the mud and tents of the Jebel displaced persons camp in South Sudan’s capital Juba on a recent Sunday.

The camp is hardly sacred ground: thousands of ethnic Nuer live here under United Nations peacekeeper protection in fear of Dinka soldiers outside. But Bishop Taban is here to conduct mass anyway.

“The church is to be with the suffering people, wherever in the world,” the 78-year-old bishop says.

Taban has no trouble crossing South Sudan’s ethnic lines to preach on Sundays. That’s because in South Sudan, church leaders are held in higher esteem than perhaps anyone else.

They earned that position through fifty years of struggle. During South Sudan’s long wars for independence from the hardline Islamist government in Khartoum, Sudan, priests and pastors brought humanitarian relief to civilians during the heaviest fighting. They lobbied the international community to support the southern cause, and, crucially, brokered peace between communities torn apart by war and ethnic strife.

Yet in South Sudan’s latest civil war, which just entered its second year, church leaders have been unable to seriously influence politicians and generals. Instead, they’ve been attacked by militants, sidelined at peace talks, and silenced at home.

It’s a shocking change for South Sudan, a country whose existence in many people’s minds is founded on the idea of religious freedom for Christians, who form the vast majority of the population. Now, church leaders are saying they have to escalate their efforts to be a neutral, trusted force that can bring politicians in line, and lead the divided populace to reconciliation.

'Dry bones' and 'grasshoppers'

South Sudan’s latest war began December 2013 when government troops began massacring Nuer in the capital, Juba. In response, the national army, called the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA), split along ethnic lines and a violent uprising began in the country’s northeast, pitting Dinka loyal to President Salva Kiir against Nuer led by former vice president Riek Machar. Both sides have committed horrific atrocities.

From the start, church leaders were shards of light in a grim conflict. Priests, pastors, and nuns protected civilians from extremists on either side, at times standing up to armed men with little more than a cross necklace for protection.

Yet in Juba and in flashpoint towns of Bor and Malakal, which saw some of the heaviest fighting, churches or clergy came under attack. Priests were murdered, and in some instances, civilians were slaughtered in churches where they sought refuge. The Presbyterian church alone lost nine clergy. By May, civilians were leaving church compounds, saying they no longer felt safe inside.

“In this situation, like in Rwanda, the blood of the tribe has become thicker than the blood of the Christ,” says Episcopal Bishop Enock Tombe, who leads a religious delegation at the peace talks.

By mid-year, as the fighting died down with the onset of rains, so did direct violence against churches. But another problem arose. The churches could not get their voices heard.

The warring parties refused church participation in peace negotiations until June, and repeatedly boycotted the talks afterward to avoid religious groups and other non-armed actors from participating.

In government-controlled areas, Catholic radio stations have been censored and shut down, with staff thrown in jail. There are reports of rebel hardliners threatening or even attacking pastors preaching moderation in their areas.

Government security agents even attempted to shut down a Catholic church-led peace march in Juba yesterday to mark the war’s first anniversary.

But the attacks have not stopped South Sudan's religious leaders from speaking out,though. Clergy have condemned the violence in increasingly militant terms, labeling the fighting “evil,” calling the country’s leaders “dry bones” in need of spiritual renewal. They’ve urged civilians not to follow the warlords like “cattle,” and lamented that politicians view those who die as “just grasshoppers,” not caring.

Meanwhile, other leaders like Taban—known for his non-judgmental approach to peacebuilding in previous wars—have used more conciliatory approaches, attempting to consult and advise.

But the politicians have not changed course.

“Has it fallen in a dead ear?” asks Taban, who says he has been trying for months to have a private meeting with President Kiir without success.

“The political leaders think that their side of the story is always correct they don’t want contradiction,” says Bishop Tombe. “[They ask us], why do you speak as if you are with the rebels?”

Losing focus?

To some, the churches’ struggle to be heard is a sign of their weakened influence since the last war. John Ashworth, a longtime adviser to South Sudan’s churches, says clergy are less united than during the long wars as each denomination has focused on rebuilding their own churches since peace in 2005.

Important clergy left the cloth altogether when presented with more worldly opportunities in peacetime. “Some of our good people; because of money, salaries they join the government,” Taban says.

Others simply lost focus. At a recent synod of one church in Juba, the main issue on the agenda was not peace, but pornography.

But to others, the disrespect for the church by top politicians is a sign of a deeper problem, one that strikes at the heart of the nation’s accepted history.

South Sudan’s independence struggle was often considered a fight for religious freedom for the mostly Christian south against the Islamist government in Khartoum.

SPLA propaganda perpetuates this story, referring to the churchgoing President Kiir, for instance, as the “Joshua” who took South Sudan to the promised land of independence after the 2005 death of the “Moses,” SPLA founder John Garang.

But this story never accorded with the facts. The SPLA began as a Marxist-influenced movement backed by Ethiopian Communists. Taban points out that during the long war, the SPLA – ostensibly fighting for southerners like him – imprisoned him for 100 days after he broke through a siege to bring food to civilians under their attack.

Tombe says the atrocities of the latest war fully explode the myth of the SPLA as Christian liberators.

“These politicians cannot claim [to be Christian],” he says. “Even if they go to church on Sunday they are not guided by Christian values only. They may be Christian by name, but Christian values have not really penetrated.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to In S. Sudan, churches struggle to keep role as trusted peacemakers
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today