NATO chief doesn't expect arms race despite US threats

Both NATO and United States officials believe Russia may be violating the 1978 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, leading to US threats to pull out of the agreement. Yet NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg doesn't think this will trigger a new cold war. 

Francisco Seco/AP
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg speaks about alleged Russian breaches of the INF treaty governing nuclear weapons acquisition at a press conference in Brussels on Oct. 24.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said Oct. 24 that he does not expect a nuclear buildup in Europe even as tensions rise over US threats to pull out of a cold war-era missile agreement amid allegations that Russia is violating the pact.

The United States insists that Russia's 9M729 missile system contravenes the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, and NATO allies agree that is probably the case. The pact between Moscow and Washington bans an entire class of weapons – all land-based cruise and ballistic missiles with a range from 310-3,410 miles.

Experts say the Russian system would operate at lower altitudes, making it tough to bring down. It could also reach targets across Europe and even the US West Coast if stationed in Siberia.

Despite concerns about its capabilities, Secretary-General Stoltenberg said he does not "foresee that allies will deploy more nuclear weapons in Europe as a response to the new Russian missile." But he added that the 29 nations in the world's biggest military alliance are now assessing "the implications of the new Russian missile for our security."

"We don't want a new cold war. We don't want a new arms race," he said at a news conference announcing the start of NATO's biggest military exercises since that era of tensions ended in 1991.

The Trident Juncture maneuvers in Norway – which shares a border with Russia – will involve around 50,000 personnel, 65 ships, 250 aircraft, and 10,000 vehicles. The hypothetical scenario involves restoring Norway's sovereignty after an attack by a "fictitious aggressor."

The NATO war games come weeks after Russia held its biggest post-cold war military exercises, in cooperation with China.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said Wednesday that the increased NATO military activities near Russia's western border will force it to take countermeasures.

"NATO's military activities near our borders have reached the highest level since the cold war times," he said, noting that NATO allies are engaged war games "simulating offensive military action."

Speaking on a trip to Belarus – Russia's ex-Soviet neighbor and current ally – Mr. Shoigu warned that Poland's plan to permanently host a US army division would affect regional stability and trigger a Russian response. He warned that Moscow will have to "take retaliatory measures to neutralize possible military threats."

Russia-West relations have sunk to a new low since Russia's 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimean peninsula and its support for a separatist insurgency in eastern Ukraine.

Fresh doubts about the INF treaty are a stark reminder of the way tensions between NATO allies and Russia soared in the 1980s during the so-called "Euromissiles crisis," when the United States deployed cruise missiles in Europe to counterbalance a perceived threat from Russia's SS-20 nuclear warheads.

The European Union has urged both the US and Russia to uphold the INF treaty, saying the pact is one of the cornerstones of European security. But Stoltenberg stopped short of calling on Washington, the biggest and most influential NATO member, to stay in the treaty.

"The INF is a landmark treaty, but the problem is that no treaty can be effective, can work, if it's only respected by one part," Stoltenberg told reporters in Brussels, noting that the "US is in full compliance."

He said, based on US estimates and Russia's reluctance to discuss the missile system with NATO, "the most plausible explanation is that Russia is in violation of the treaty."

In Norway on Tuesday, four US soldiers were hurt, none of them seriously, in a vehicle accident while their convoy was delivering cargo for the military exercise.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Vladimir Isachenkov in Moscow contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to NATO chief doesn't expect arms race despite US threats
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2018/1024/NATO-chief-doesn-t-expect-arms-race-despite-US-threats
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe