UN urges family planning assistance for the world's poorest women

A new United Nations Population Fund report says giving women and girls in developing countries control over when and how many children they have is key to ending global poverty by 2030. 

Melanie Stetson Freeman/The Christian Science Monitor
Billboards around Meskel Square advertise different products including condoms (r.) for birth control, on May 8, 2017, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A new report from the United Nations Population Fund stresses that family planning assistance for the world's poorest women is key to ending global poverty.

A failure to give the world's poorest women control over their bodies could widen inequality in developing countries and thwart progress towards global goals aimed at ending poverty by 2030, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) said on Tuesday.

Countless women and girls worldwide are denied a say in decisions about sex and childbirth, and struggle to access health services such as family planning, leaving them at risk of unwanted pregnancies and abortions, a UNFPA report said.

Access to birth control allows women to delay and space births, reducing mother and child deaths, boosts economies by freeing up women to work, and leads to smaller families with parents able to spend more on children's health and education.

Yet many of the world's poorest women – particularly the youngest, least educated and those living in rural areas – are missing out because such services are too few, too costly, or frowned upon by their families and communities, experts say.

This can widen the gender gap, reinforce inequality between the poorest and richest, and ultimately weaken economies, UNFPA said in its annual flagship 'State of World Population' report.

Denying women access to reproductive health services may also undermine the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a global plan to end poverty and inequality by 2030, it said.

"Inequality today is not only about the haves and have nots ... [it] is increasingly about the cans and cannots," UNFPA's executive director, Natalia Kanem, said in a statement.

"Poor women who lack the means to make their own decisions about family size or who are in poor health because of inadequate reproductive health care dominate the ranks of the cannots," she said ahead of the launch of the report in London.

Funding threat

The report comes at an uncertain time for global efforts to improve family planning, with the United States, one of UNFPA's top donors, having said in April it would stop funding the agency. The US contributed $69 million in 2016.

In one of his first actions as US president, President Trump reinstated a policy known by critics as the "global gag" rule, which withholds US funding for international groups that perform abortions or tell women about legal options to do so.

"We are really sad that it has come to this," Ms. Kanem told the Thomson Reuters Foundation at the London launch of the report.

"There is nothing more unfair than having a woman or girl, and her desires, relegated to the bottom of the heap."

International donors vowed to help fill the funding gap at a summit on family planning in July, pledging $207 million. Yet UNFPA says it still needs an extra $700 million by 2020.

Kanem said she feared this gap would hinder UNFPA's ability to deliver services to those most in need – mainly rural women.

At least 214 million women in developing nations cannot get access to contraceptives – resulting in 89 million unintended pregnancies and 48 million abortions each year, says UNFPA.

However, a rising number of countries have pledged to boost their spending on reproductive health services, as part of the Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) initiative – which aims to give 120 million more women worldwide access to birth control.

Cambodia, Senegal, and Rwanda have made the biggest strides since 2005 in reducing inequalities in access to contraception, antenatal care and skilled birth attendants, and cutting neonatal deaths among the poorest mothers, the report found.

Universal access to reproductive health services would lead to economic benefits of $430 billion a year, experts say. Every $1 invested in family planning services yields up to $6 in savings on public services from health to housing, studies show.

"When people talk about inequality, they often think about money and wealth ... but economic inequality is just the tip of the equality iceberg," Richard Kollodge, senior editor of the UNFPA report, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation by phone.

"A new perspective which focuses on sexual and reproductive rights can help level the playing field," Mr. Kollodge added.

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.