What does leaked memo suggest about plans for Brexit?

The Times of London is reporting that a leaked memo written by a British government consultant says that the government lacks coherent plans for leaving the European Union.

Jack Taylor / PA via AP
A memo reported to have been prepared by a consultant to the British government says splits within Prime Minister Theresa May's team have slowed creation of any strategy for Britain's exit from the European Union.

Britain may have no overall plan for the Brexit, according to a new memo first leaked to the Times newspaper.

The British government denies the memo’s allegations, among which are claims that the Prime Minister Theresa May has little understanding of what the Brexit will really mean for industry, and that withdrawing from the European Union will require 30,000 extra staff.

"This unsolicited document has nothing to do with the government at all,” a government spokesperson told the BBC. "It was produced by an individual from an external accountancy firm. It has no authority and we don't recognise any of the claims it makes. We are getting on with the job of delivering Brexit and making a success of it."

The November 7 memo was written by consulting group Deloitte for the Cabinet Office, and suggests that the government’s alleged 500 Brexit-related projects could be making the process excessively unwieldy.

Although the British people have already voted in favor of Brexit, the government must set in place a number of procedures before it can actually be carried out. Prime Minister May hopes to begin the Brexit process by the end of March next year. It is expected to take two years.

According to the memo, however, it will take about six months for the government to determine its priorities, a lengthy wait that is due in part to May’s desire to settle matters herself.

"Every department has developed a 'bottom-up' plan of what the impact of Brexit could be – and its plan to cope with the 'worst case,” says the report. "Although necessary, this falls considerably short of having a 'government plan for Brexit' because it has no prioritisation and no link to the overall negotiation strategy."

The memo also states that the businesses are right to be concerned by the Brexit, as the government’s current priority is the survival of a Conservative government, not the British economy.

Furthermore, the memo notes that economic power players could, like carmaker Nissan, “put a gun” to the government’s head in order to ensure that they would not be at an economic disadvantage due to the Brexit.

Euroskeptic Tory members of government are calling the memo “bogus,” and say that it is an attempt by industry to undermine the Brexit. Deloitte chief executive David Sproul signed a letter urging voters to vote “remain” prior to this summer’s referendum.

"It's complete nonsense. You don't need consultants who are against Brexit and trying to undermine it. They are not speaking for the Government and I'm very glad they are not. Brexit can be much quicker, better and cheaper than they think,” Tory MP and leading Euroskeptic John Redwood told the Telegraph.

While some Labour MPs agree that the Brexit could be problematic, they say that the will not oppose the process as it is carried out over the next few years.

"To do so would put Labour against the majority will of the British people and on the side of certain corporate elites, who have always had the British people at the back of the queue," shadow chancellor John McDonnell will say in an upcoming speech, reports the BBC.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What does leaked memo suggest about plans for Brexit?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today