Middle Class no longer majority: Does it matter?

The middle class, long celebrated as the dominant political force in the United States, has declined to less than 50 percent of the population by one new measure.

Tony Avelar / The Christian Science Monitor
The middle-class housing development of Eagle Ranch is seen in Eagle Colorado.

Americans with a middle class income have declined from a majority in the 1970s to half the population, but policy has successfully shifted key groups up during the same time.

The bottom and top segments of America's income spectrum have grown, according to a Pew Research Center study published Wednesday. Preserving a healthy middle class is considered by many to be an economic and political imperative because it is traditionally the place where citizens do much of the heavy lifting of democracy, John Yemma wrote for The Christian Science Monitor.

"The middle class is the bedrock of democracy," he wrote. "It is where work gets done, families thrive, and a society’s values are established. People from Benjamin Franklin to the current candidates running for president have lauded the middle class as the quintessence of the American dream."

Part of the shift shows economic growth, as the upper class increased from 14 percent in 1971 to 21 percent. Perhaps even more surprising is that the share of aggregate income that went to upper-class families increased from 29 percent in 1970 to 49 percent today.

"Notably, the 7 percentage point increase in the share at the top is nearly double the 4 percentage point increase at the bottom," according to Pew.

The Pew data illustrates the impact of the Great Recession on lower income groups especially, however. The lower class has grown from 25 percent in 1971 to 29 percent. This means high-income families are much wealthier than middle-class families than they were several decades ago. And there are also nearly twice as many of them.

Certain demographic groups moved up at a higher rate than others, and "winners" included women, members of all races except Hispanics, and married households. Demographic groups whose shift has been negative include Hispanics, twenty-somethings, and anyone with less than a bachelor's degree.

The drop for Hispanics reflects an increase in the number of immigrants starting out at a lower income, according to Pew, because when considered separately, Hispanic immigrants and and US citizens alike advanced. The biggest gain goes to senior citizens, and the Pew authors suggest this is a policy success story.

"Not coincidentally, the poverty rate among people 65 and older fell from 24.6% in 1970 to 10% in 2014," according to Pew. "Evidence shows that rising Social Security benefits have played a key role in improving the economic status of older adults."

Younger Americans looking at the job market feel less confident about their middle-class prospects. The approaching doom of the middle class may be a myth, but the market is shifting as jobs become either unskilled or highly skilled, without much in between, reported Mark Trumbull for The Christian Science Monitor:

Optimism about the future persists among moderate-income Americans to a degree that may seem surprising. It has just been tempered. The new watchword is realism – the awareness that the economically ascendant America of the baby boomers has now been superseded by an era of sluggish wage growth and financial setbacks.

Half the American population is still solidly in the middle class, according to the study, so it's early yet for funeral arrangements. The concern is that the middle class has held a solid majority for four decades but is now declining because of growth in the lower and upper income tiers.

In an election year, the health of the middle class will likely come up, as both Democrats and Republicans support a strong middle class. If the Pew data is true, then much of what would revitalize the middle class could be well within the grasp of policymakers. Anything that promotes stable families and quality education is likely to energize the middle class.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Middle Class no longer majority: Does it matter?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/1210/Middle-Class-no-longer-majority-Does-it-matter
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe