After debate dust-up, Sarah and Bristol Palin come to Trump's defense

Why the odd pairing might be smart politics.

Cliff Owen/AP/File
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Md., in February.

They both have a track record for controversial comments that captivate as many people as they rankle, for using the national spotlight to tap into populist conservative grievances, and for earning devoted – if for some, perplexing – followings.

The Trump-Palin alliance goes back a long way.

It was on display again this Monday when Bristol Palin, daughter of one-time GOP vice-presidential candidate and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, slammed Fox News for its treatment of Donald Trump during last Thursday's GOP debate.

“I used to use this blog to point out how liberals use the ‘outrage industry’ to manipulate people and keep their power. Now Republicans are just as bad,” Ms. Palin wrote in her Patheos blog.

Fox News was praised by some for its tough line of questioning in the debate, including The New York Times' Frank Bruni who called it "riveting," and "admirable."

"We only have so many opportunities to hear from the fifty million candidates who are apparently running for President," Palin wrote. "And we get the Fox moderators asking questions that the New York Times applauds?"

She quoted conservative talk radio host Mark Levin, who said Saturday, "[The debate process] is supposed to inform the American people. Not gotcha questions, not gossip … Let’s focus on winning the election, not winning accolades from The New York Times."

Since the debate, Mr. Trump and Fox News have had a public dust-up, with Trump attacking the conservative network for what he called unfair treatment during the debate.

Following the debate, Trump specifically targeted Fox moderator Megyn Kelly, telling CNN’s Don Lemon: "You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her – wherever."

That was enough for RedState's Erick Erickson to disinvite Trump from a prominent gathering of conservatives: “[T]here are even lines blunt talkers and unprofessional politicians should not cross," said Mr. Erickson in explaining his decision. "Decency is one of those lines.”

Bristol is not the only Palin standing by the outspoken presidential front-runner. In fact, the public friendship between the Alaska hockey mom and the New York real estate mogul reaches back years. In 2011, Sarah Palin backed Trump's birther claims against President Obama, telling Fox News, "I appreciate that 'The Donald' wants to spend his resources in getting to the bottom of something that so interests him and many Americans."

When former Governor Palin was flirting with a presidential run in 2011, Trump said, "She's a great woman, a terrific woman and a terrific friend. I'd love her to run."

More recently, Palin, who was Arizona Sen. John McCain's running mate in the 2008 election, refused to criticize Trump's comments questioning the senator's standing as a war hero, instead calling Trump "a hero in another arena."

In response, Trump hired a former Palin aide, Michael Glassner, and said he'd love to put Palin in his cabinet "because she really is somebody who knows what's happening and she's a special person."

The odd pairing is smart politics.

For Trump, criticized for his past liberal leanings, the support of Palin, with her unimpeachable conservative credentials, is political gold.

For Palin, who has been out of the spotlight recently – her Fox News contract is over, her recent speech at Iowa's Freedom Summit was widely panned, and polls indicate most Republicans do not want her to run for president – Trump is a way to regain attention and relevance.

As Stuart Stevens, the strategist for Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign, told Politico, "Good for both of them and smart on Trump’s part. She appeals to a certain segment of the electorate and has been largely left out of the discussion and, for her, it’s a way to participate more."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.