Trump shut out of conservative meeting after incendiary remarks

The organizers of the RedState Gathering withdrew Trump's invitation after remarks during Thursday's debate widely considered as attacks on women.

Donald Trump opened his mouth again and found the door closed to him Saturday at a high-profile gathering of conservative activists.

His latest incendiary comment, about one of the Fox News moderators from Thursday's first Republican presidential debate, led to a scolding by some of his rivals and the party, and condemnation by organizers of the RedState Gathering.

Trump's absence from Saturday's program threatened to overshadow appearances by a number of his rivals, including former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

The billionaire businessman lashed out against Fox News' Megyn Kelly for her questions during the campaign's first debate. She had asked the candidate about his use of derogatory language toward women and whether it reflected the "temperament of a man we should elect as president."

Referring to Kelly's questions, Trump told CNN in an interview late Friday, "There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever."

Soon after the interview aired, RedState's Erick Erickson booted Trump from the event's Saturday lineup. In U.S. politics,

"I just don't want someone on stage who gets a hostile question from a lady and his first inclination is to imply it was hormonal. It just was wrong," Erickson wrote on the RedState website. The website takes its name from electoral maps which depict Republican-leaning states in red.

Erickson said that "while Mr. Trump resonates with a lot of people with his bluntness, including me to a degree, there are just real lines of decency a person running for president should not cross."

Trump's campaign was incensed — and unbowed.

"This is just another example of weakness through being politically correct. For all of the people who were looking forward to Mr. Trump coming, we will miss you. Blame Erick Erickson, your weak and pathetic leader," according to a campaign statement.

In a follow-up statement Saturday morning, Trump's camp intensified the personal attack against Erickson, slammed Kelly again and contended that the candidate's precise words on CNN were "blood was coming out of her eyes and whatever." That description deviated from the telephone interview that aired.

The campaign claimed that the 900 activists who had wanted to hear from Trump on Saturday evening were contacting the campaign to complain about Erickson and others who "are trying to be so politically correct. To them, Mr. Trump said, 'We will catch you at another time soon.'"

Two of Trump's rivals, former technology executive Carly Fiorina and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, said there was no excuse for Trump's words about Kelly. They said they stood with the journalist.

The Republican National Committee, treading carefully about the current front-runner for the 2016 nomination, called on Trump to "immediately clarify" his comment and said it would be "highly inappropriate" if Trump stood by his remarks.

Trump needs "to understand that he is seeking the presidency of the United States now and that words do matter," RNC spokesman Sean Spicer told NBC's "Today" show on Saturday.

"I'm hoping that Mr. Trump, because he does speak off the cuff, because he doesn't ascribe to political correctness, was speaking in a way that wasn't fully thought out," Spicer said.

If there was anything close to a consensus among activists at the event, it was that they still wanted to hear what Trump had to say.

"Personally, we need to make up our own minds if someone is stupid," said Jack Staver, a business consultant from Woodstock, Georgia. "If someone is going to fall on their face, let them do it for everyone to see. Maybe it will help us make up our minds in a primary like this."

Not wanting to give him that chance was Dulcy Forte, 68, of Austin, Texas, already turned off by Trump'ssuggestion that he might not support the eventual Republican nominee — if it's not him.

"I always thought Donald Trump was a little crude, but, more importantly, he's not a good Republican," Forte said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.