For Chicago and Cleveland, an unthinkable question: What if we win?

The Chicago Cubs face the Cleveland Indians in the World Series. For some Cubs fans, in particular, the prospect is wonderful and terrifying.

Chicago Cubs fans hold up a sign as centerfielder Dexter Fowler (24) walks back to the dugout during Game 6 of the National League Championship Series against the Los Angeles Dodgers at Wrigley Field Saturday. 

Yes, the thought actually occurred to Alan Herman.

A few years ago, on a deep-sea fishing trip with his boat caught in violent storm, Mr. Herman began to fear for this life.

“Is this the way I’m going to die?” he worried.

Then, of course, he thought about the Chicago Cubs.

He had never seen them win the World Series. 

Beginning Tuesday with Game 1 of the World Series against the Cleveland Indians, many Cubs fans are honestly beginning to contemplate the end of that one constant in their life: For better or (mostly) worse, the Cubs were always the “loveable loser.” The team has not won the World Series since 1908 and not even appeared in one since 1945, two years before Jackie Robinson broke baseball’s color barrier.

Yes, Cleveland has not won a World Series since 1948 (baseball’s second-longest drought). But it has appeared in a World Series as recently as 1997, and this spring, basketball’s Cleveland Cavaliers broke the city’s 52-year title drought in any professional sport.

By Cub standards, their cup runneth over. 

It is a prospect that, to some Cub bleacher bums, is terrifying.

“I’m more scared of what happens if we win,” says Justin Glawe, a Cubs fan in his 30s, in a text message. “We know failure. We understand it. We know depression and sadness; some of us wallow in it. What we don’t know is success.”

The simple joys of Cub fandom

It was the same prospect facing Boston Red Sox fans in 2004, when they ended their 86-year title drought. But while the Red Sox drought was characterized by angst and frustration, the Cubs’ last 107 years have been only occasionally punctuated with enough success to generate frustration.

In that way, being a Cub fan has been less about hope than the simple pleasure of the sport – and of Wrigley Field – without the burden of expectation.

“Let’s play two,” as Cubs great Ernie Banks once said, is about the joy of the game for its sake and the knowledge that, win or lose, you can give it another try the next day.

“Life is not a challenge as much,” says Herman, who is in his 50s. The Cubs’ larger lesson is: “there’s going to be another game in your life tomorrow.”

Marty Behn, also in his 50s and a longtime season-ticket holder, remembers when there were so few fans at Wrigley that the team closed the upper deck. He’s not so worried about the existential angst over a potential Cubs win.

“It’s a great question, but … I’ve been waiting my whole life for this,” he says. “If somehow the mystique behind being a Cubs fan is lost … I don’t care.”

Indians fans won’t be outdone. Cleveland’s economic struggles, together with its futility across professional sports, had become a part of the city’s identity. “They call [the city] ‘the factory of sadness,’ ” says Matt Theel, a longtime fan.

So the Cavaliers championship and the World Series berth have buoyed spirits, perhaps disproportionately. “These things have been alleviated,” he adds.

What 'curse'?

It’s a reminder that the talk of “curses” is nothing more mysterious than making better sports decisions and changing an old mind-set.

Indians manager Terry Francona and Cubs manager Joe Maddon are cut from the same cloth in that way.

In an interview with the Cleveland Plain-Dealer, Indians’ owner Paul Dolan said Francona has given the franchise “a culture of winning, a culture of hope.” And Maddon, asked about the concept of the “loveable losers” this weekend, shrugged it off.

“You know that thing I’d always heard, about the Cubs being lovable losers, I never quite understood that,” he told ESPN, “because that’s not how I was raised. So getting here and really not paying attention to all the nonsense, the superstition that really has dragged a lot of people’s minds down – to escape that is great.”

For Herman’s part, he expects the Cubs to win. But he’s also prepared, as always, for disappointment. After all, he says, it won’t be the end of the world. “It would just mean the beat goes on.” 

Glawe just hopes that, if the Cubs do win, fans don’t lose the simple joys of being a Cubs fan.

“I just don’t want us to become jaded and forget all the 38-degree opening days when we watched for love rather than an expectation of winning.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to For Chicago and Cleveland, an unthinkable question: What if we win?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today