Is Minneapolis having a Ferguson moment?

A young black man was shot Sunday morning. A state investigation has been launched, but details surrounding the incident remain undisclosed by the police. 

Jeff Wheeler/Star Tribune/AP
Some demonstrators sat down in the street as others chanted at Minneapolis police officers at the side entrance to the 4th Precinct station on Morgan Ave. N. Sunday, in Minneapolis, after a man was shot by Minneapolis police early Sunday morning.

In the early hours of Sunday morning, a Minneapolis, Minn. police officer shot a young black man, according to local news reports.

Full details surrounding the incident are incomplete, protests have burst across the community following the shooting of whom family members and the Minneapolis chapter of the NAACP identify as Jamar Clark, age 24.

This has not been confirmed by the police, and the the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has launched an independent investigation. The most crucial facts of the case are still contended: Eyewitnesses say the man had been handcuffed and shot in the head while he was lying down. Investigators say otherwise.

Here’s what we do know about the case: Around 12:45 a.m. Sunday, the police were called to the scene of an assault. Minneapolis deputy police chief Bruce Folkens said at a news conference that they had intel that the suspect was keeping the paramedics from treating the victim.

And then a “physical altercation” took place between the paramedics and the suspect, Folkens said. A shot was fired, and the suspect was taken to Hennepin County Medical Center.

The police say he is in critical condition. According to family members, however, a physician had told them that Clark is now brain dead. One relative told the Minneapolis Star Tribune that he was shot “execution style.”

Nekelia Sharp, a neighbor from across the street, said there had been an argument between Clark and his girlfriend, and an ambulance was called. When paramedics were treating the girlfriend, Sharp said, Clark tried to talk to her – then he was handcuffed and shot.

Another neighbor posted her account on Facebook.

“There were literally dozens of witnesses looking from the apartments,” she wrote. “The crowd said that the police already had him down on the ground when they shot him. I heard a shot and got there within seconds. All the witnesses were yelling they shot the man while he was already down and handcuffed.”

As the throng of bystanders lingered at the scene, shouting, police called for backup. Scanner audio from that night indicates that an officer had requested every available squad car. “We’ve got a big crowd,” he was heard saying. “We need a lot of cops.”

Some witnesses say they were pepper-sprayed.

Minneapolis police chief Janeé Harteau said in a press conference Sunday afternoon that preliminary evidence shows that the suspect was not in handcuffs. The two police officers involved in the incident have been put on paid administrative leave.

“I want to acknowledge this is a very difficult situation for everyone involved,” Harteau said. “We’ve spoken with the man’s family and we’ve reached out to many community leaders.”

“We need to know exactly what happened,” she continued. “We need to know the truth. Everyone involved needs that and deserves that.”

She urged people with information about the incident to come forward and contact the BCA.

In the meantime, hundreds of Black Lives Matter activists protested at the scene of the shooting since 3 p.m. Sunday. Demanding the release of security footage from a nearby building and a federal investigation into the incident, the protesters rallied into the evening.

They did not attend a nearby community meeting called by Minneapolis mayor Betsy Hodges at the local Urban League office nearby, though it did not last long as people were yelling “Justice for who? Jamar!”

Jason Sole, a professor at Metropolitan State University and a member of the local NAACP chapter, is among the group calling for justice.

“We’ve been saying for a long time that Minneapolis was one bullet away from Ferguson,” he said. “Well, that bullet was fired last night.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.