US Open: Jordan Spieth joins Woods, Palmer, and Nicklaus

Jordan Spieth won the US Open Sunday, just two months after winning the Masters. Next up: The British Open at St. Andrews. 

Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports NPStrans TopPic/Reuters
Jun 21, 2015; University Place, WA, USA; Jordan Spieth hoists the U.S. Open Championship Trophy after winning the 2015 U.S. Open golf tournament at Chambers Bay. Mandatory Credit:

Jordan Spieth won the US Open Sunday, just two months after winning the Masters at Augusta, Georgia.

That puts the 21-year old Texan on hallowed ground, shared by only six other golfers who have won both tournaments in the same year: Tiger Woods, Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus, Craig Wood, and Ben Hogan. The last player to win the Masters and the US Open in the same year was Woods in 2002.

Spieth won in dramatic fashion at the links-style Chambers Bay golf course in University Place, Wash.

With a 25-foot birdie putt on the 16th hole, Spieth finally had a three-shot lead on his nearest competitors. But one hole later, he hit what he later described as one of his worst shots in recent memory. And his lead was gone. Stepping into the tee box on the 18th hole, Spieth was tied at four under with South African Louis Oosthuizen and American Dustin Johnson. 

But Spieth put the fiasco of the 17th hole behind him, and birdied the last hole. Then, it was up to Johnson to catch him. On the par 5 18th hole, Johnson was on the green in two and was looking at a 12-foot putt for an eagle, and victory. He missed. Then, he missed again, leaving him in a tie for second, and Spieth with the outright victory.

"I'm still in shock," he said with the gleaming US Open trophy at his side. "I've never experienced a feeling like this. It was a very intense back nine," the Associated Press reported. "I'm still amazed that I won, let alone that we weren't playing tomorrow," Spieth said. "So for that turnaround right there, to watch that happen, I feel for Dustin, but I haven't been able to put anything in perspective yet."

What about winning the grand slam – the four major tournaments in pro golf? Next month, Spieth will compete in the British Open at St. Andrews in Scotland. 

“To go to the home of golf, that’s the sole focus. But you can’t win them all unless you win the first two I guess. I believe we’ll be able to get it done if we get the right prep in," said Spieth, according to the Guardian. 

Doug Ferguson at AP writes:

Spieth finished at 5-under 275 in winning for the third time this year. He is still No. 2 and closing fast on Rory McIlroy, who has top-10s in both majors this year without being a serious contender.

Spieth becomes the first player since Jones to make birdie on the 72nd hole to win the U.S. Open by one shot -- all because of Johnson's three-putt. He also became the youngest player with two majors since Gene Sarazen in 1922.

For all the criticism of the unique course at Chambers Bay, this was the theater at its finest.

But there will be lingering questions about the condition of the greens, so bumpy that they were referred to as broccoli, and Billy Horschel said he lost respect for the USGA. This championship ended with a short miss, the target of complaints all week.

"As you can tell, it's very difficult to get them in the hole out there," Johnson said. "The greens were really fast and they were rolling fairly smooth, but it was still bouncing a little bit."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.