DNC chair slams GOP 'silence' on Mueller indictments

At a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters, Tom Perez says the Trump team's legal difficulties notwithstanding, the Democratic Party must rebuild if it wants to reclaim power in Washington.

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez speaks at the St. Regis Hotel, Oct. 31, 2017, in Washington.

The head of the Democratic Party criticized Republican leaders Tuesday for what he said was “such appalling silence” on the criminal charges brought against former Trump campaign aides by special counsel Robert Mueller.

Speaking at a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters, the Democratic National Committee chair, Tom Perez, said top GOP officials including Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan kept silent in the face of “an assault not simply on the DNC but on our democracy.”

“It is clear the Russians were trying to traffic in the [Clinton campaign] emails and present them to … the Trump campaign so they could help Donald Trump get elected,” Mr. Perez charged. “You see with the indictment of Manafort and Gates that the rot went all way to the top of the campaign.”

Paul Manafort served as the Trump campaign’s chair and Rick Gates, a former business associate, as a campaign adviser. Both men were charged Monday with federal crimes by Mr. Mueller and pled not guilty in a court appearance. Another Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulus, pled guilty to lying to federal investigators.

The legal challenges surrounding the Trump campaign team notwithstanding, Perez was clear that if the Democratic Party wants to reclaim power in Washington or in individual states, it needs to rebuild.

Since his election as party chair in February 2017, Perez said, “we looked at what happened over the last eight years that resulted in the loss” of over 1,000 seats in state legislatures, 12 seats in the US Senate, and cut Democratic governorships from 28 to 15.

A key element of the rebuilding, he said, was changing the DNC’s mission.  Rather than just focusing largely on helping elect a president every four years, Perez said, “we are the party that helps elect people, up and down the ticket, from the school board to the Oval Office.”

In addition to broadening the DNC’s mission, Perez also has the task of bringing together the very different ideological wings of the party represented by Hillary Clinton and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. 

“The issue of unity is something we have to fight for and continue to strive for every single day,” Perez said. “I am not oblivious to the fact that I walked into a DNC where we had work to do on the unity front.”

Unity is not universal in the Republican Party either, with former White House aide Steve Bannon threatening to lead primary challenges to sitting Republican senators. 

“If Steve Bannon wants to continue to facilitate a circular firing squad on the Republican side, I am certainly not going to stand in the way of that,” Perez said.

While Perez was not leading the DNC during the 2016 campaign, he defended the fact that the DNC paid for opposition research conducted by the firm Fusion GPS, which hired a British spy to assemble the document. The White House has taken strong exception to the dossier.

“Opposition research is not simply something that ought to be done, it would be malpractice not to do it, especially when you have a presidential candidate who blew convention out of the window,” Perez said. “He didn’t disclose his tax returns, the first time that has happened in decades. He has a very shady relationship with Russian authorities.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to DNC chair slams GOP 'silence' on Mueller indictments
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today