Tom Coburn: farewell to a rabble-rousing statesman

Tom Coburn, who delivered babies before running for Congress, relished taking on sacred cows and special interests. But he also understood that both sides had to give a little.

C-SPAN2-AP/File
This frame grab from video, provided by C-SPAN2 shows Sen. Tom Coburn (R) of Oklahoma giving his farewell address on the floor of the Senate on Capitol Hill in Washington, Dec. 11, 2014.

Republican Tom Coburn has had better luck with "60 Minutes" than most politicians, with the possible exception of President Obama. The CBS show did a nice profile on him on Dec. 21, and a year ago, he scored some success with a segment on his Waste Book’s examination of disability fraud.

It’s probably a coincidence that the retiring Oklahoma senator told Leslie Stahl that he loves Obama and that he is proud that America elected him.

As Stahl pointed out, Coburn is also one of the president’s fiercest critics. 

“The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.”

F. Scott Fitzgerald could have been talking about Tom Coburn when he made that statement.

He was a rabble-rouser when he was first elected to the House in the 1994, and he was a rabble-rouser when he leaves the Senate at the end of the year.

Tom Coburn has never been dull.

A avowedly pro-life obstetrician, Coburn made news when he demanded that the Ethics Committee allow him to continue to practice medicine as a member of the House (for some stupid reason, the Committee wanted him to stop delivering babies).

He made more news when he gave lectures to congressional staff about the danger of sexually transmitted diseases.

He was a term-limits guy during that first revolutionary class, so he left the House after three terms. Unlike some of his colleagues, he kept his word.

It is far better to make promises that you know you will keep, and Coburn knew that he didn’t want to spend more than six years in the House.

He didn’t make any bold term limits promises when he ran for the Senate to replace former GOP Whip Don Nickles. He had learned by then that Washington changes slow.

Coburn grew into statesman. He didn’t mind taking on sacred cows and special interests that paraded as ideological purists. He understood that in order to move the ball forward on issues like the debt, that both sides had to give a little.

He also chafed at members who turned over their voting cards to outside activist groups. Elected representatives are supposed to do the job of voting themselves, not outsourcing it to shadowy groups who are chiefly funded by the rich and powerful.

Coburn was always courageous, always cantankerous, and always willing to call it like he saw it.

It was important that he said the thing he said about President Obama.

I don’t agree with the president on many things (his love of the White Sox is one of those things where we agree). But he is the president, duly elected twice by the American people, and I respect him and the job he holds.

That he and Tom Coburn are friends and have remained friends is an important narrative about how our democracy works.

We can disagree on philosophy, on issues, on the weather, on tax policy, even on the efficacy of our drug laws or Obamacare. But for this democracy to work, we have to find the common humanity that links us as Americans and find a way to find common ground.

I don’t always agree with Tom Coburn and, at times, he can actually be pretty annoying. His refusal to allow the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) to pass is a case in point.

But I always respected him and valued his contributions to our country.

It’s too bad he is leaving Congress. He will be missed.

John Feehery publishes his Feehery Theory blog at http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.