John Boehner exit: Anyone can run for House speaker, even you

Who replaces Speaker of the House John Boehner? Non-House members have received votes for speaker, and that’s a trend that seems to be growing.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP
, SeHouse Speaker John Boehner of Ohio speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington on Friday. In a stunning move, Boehner informed fellow Republicans that he would resign from Congress at the end of October.

Who can replace Speaker of the House John Boehner, who announced Friday he’s quitting? Almost anyone. Maybe even you.

This isn’t a comment on the job Representative Boehner has or has not done in his role as leader of his legislative chamber. It’s meant to illustrate a little-known fact: Under the Constitution, the speaker does not have to be a member of the House. He or she doesn’t have to be an elected lawmaker or government official. The speaker can be an ordinary, private citizen.

In fact, there really are not any legal restrictions on qualifications for that office. The relevant words are from the Constitution’s Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5: “The House of Representatives shall chuse [sic] their Speaker and other Officers."

That’s it. Nothing about being a sitting representative. There’s not even an age limit.

Yes, this means Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas could theoretically become leader of Congress’s other chamber. He’s a big favorite of the restive House conservatives who helped make Boehner’s work life so tough.

He probably won’t, though. His support in the House Republican caucus overall isn’t broad.

In practice, the lack of qualification requirements for the speaker job has not meant much.

“Although the Constitution does not so require, the Speaker has always been a Member of the House,” notes a Congressional Research Service report on the subject.

But non-House members have received votes for speaker, and that’s a trend that seems to be growing. In 1997, two retired GOP members got one vote apiece (Newt Gingrich won with 216). In 2013, one retired member, an ex-comptroller general, and former Secretary of State Colin Powell received votes (Boehner won, with 220).

In 2015, Mr. Powell got a vote again, as did Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky. No Cruz votes, though. Boehner was reelected – for the last time, it turns out.

The fact that the Constitution does not lay out speaker requirements is a function of the fact that the Founding Fathers left the House a lot of flexibility to shape the office in all ways.

“Beyond naming the position, the Constitution does not elaborate on the duties or responsibilities of the office,” points out congressional scholar Ilona Nickles.

They’ve evolved over the years, to the point where the speaker is expected to strike a difficult balancing act: He or she is the presiding officer of the House, and thus represents the interests of all members; and the individual is the leader of the majority party, and thus an important partisan actor.

Past speakers were autocrats. In the early 1920s, Speaker Joseph Cannon (R) simply blocked political opponents from speaking on the House floor. That kind of thing doesn’t happen anymore.

“They have been restrained by the reality that forging party unity among different factions within their own caucus, and seeking consensus among independent-minded members in both parties, is a complex and difficult process,” writes Ms. Nickles.

It’s so difficult, in fact, that it helped convince the current speaker it’s time to move on.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to John Boehner exit: Anyone can run for House speaker, even you
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today