Speaker John Boehner resigns: the fallout

John Boehner went out on a personal high note – and on his own terms. 

Susan Walsh//AP/File
House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, July 29, 2015. Boehner announced Friday, September 25, he will step down from his leadership post and resign from Congress by the end of October.

Update: This piece was updated at noon.

House Speaker John Boehner stunned Washington on Friday by announcing that he will step down from his leadership post and resign from Congress by the end of October.

The move ends Mr. Boehner’s long struggle over goals and tactics with the restive conservative faction of the House GOP. But it could lead to a more immediate, open, and contentious fight between the tea party and establishment wings of the party over leadership posts, spending bills, and even the upcoming 2016 presidential race.

“This will set off an unbelievable scramble,” tweeted Politico staff writer Jake Sherman in the wake of the announcement, echoing the sentiments of reporters throughout the nation’s capital.

Quick reaction: Perhaps a fall government shutdown is now less likely. Speaker Boehner was facing a revolt from the right due to his evident reluctance to force a shutdown over the issue of stripping Planned Parenthood of its government funding. Many members said after his resignation announcement that the trade off seemed clear: Boehner would now join with Democrats to pass the budget over conservative objections, then leave the House.

But the longer-term outlook on this issue isn’t so clear. Winning the intra-party vote to replace Boehner may require a promise to the right to use the congressional power of the purse to press future legislative conflicts. The legislative balance of power doesn’t favor the GOP on this tactic, due to the power President Obama’s veto pen and the blocking ability of the Democratic minority in the Senate. But many GOP members, as well as substantial numbers of the party’s base voters, have been hungering for a confrontation. Now they’ll probably get one.

 

Quick reaction, Part 2: Boehner went out on a personal high note. He is well-known for public emotions and for his devout Catholicism. On Thursday, he stood at the West Front of the US Capitol with Pope Francis, and looked down at a huge crowd gathered below. He tried, and largely failed, to keep from crying.

Now he’s chosen to leave on his own terms. It’s unlikely he would have actually fallen to a procedural vote calling for his ouster, as Georgetown University government affairs expert Joshua Huder explained this morning at Rule 22, a blog devoted to congressional issues.

“The only way John Boehner will vacate the speakership is if he decides he no longer wants the job,” Huder wrote, prior to Boehner’s move.

That’s exactly what happened.

Quick reaction, Part 3: This will have a real effect on the Republican Party’s choice of presidential nominee. Sen. Ted Cruz and other conservatives will now get to walk some ways down the path of legislative conflict, as they have urged. How voters react, and what that does to their chances of winning the nomination, remain to be seen.

But for reporters in Washington, the autumn months of 2015 now promise to be much more interesting.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.