Obama to give major immigration speech tonight. Why won't the major networks broadcast it?

ABC, CBS, and NBC viewers will miss an important presidential address on immigration reform on Thursday night. Why won't the networks televise Obama's speech?

Gerald Herbert/AP
A one-year-old holds a sign at a protest outside the US Citizenship & Immigration Service office in New Orleans on Wednesday. President Obama plans to deliver a major address on immigration on Thursday evening.

At 8 PM on Thursday, President Obama plans to address the nation on immigration reform, one of the most politically explosive and highly contentious issues of his presidency. It's a major speech, one in which Obama is expected to announce sweeping immigration reform, including a plan to protect up to 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation. The White House even promoted the speech in this Facebook video.

Yet, despite the speech's significance, the three major networks - ABC, NBC, and CBS - will not be airing it.

“In 2006, Bush gave a 17 minute speech that was televised by all three networks that was about deploying 6000 national guard troops to the border," a senior administration official told POLITICO. "Obama is making a 10 minute speech that will have a vastly greater impact on the issue. And none of the networks are doing it.”

Why aren't the major networks televising Obama's speech?

According to CNN Senior Media Correspondent Brian Stelter, administration officials put out feelers and determined that the networks would be reluctant to hand over air time, so decided not to formally request that they carry the President's address.

The networks that will be carrying the speech, however, provide insight. In addition to PBS, and cable news networks such as CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC, two Spanish-language networks, Univision and Telemundo, will broadcast the speech live. Univision is even delaying its broadcast of the Latin Grammys to accommodate Obama's address.

"It makes you think about who his audience really is, Stelter told CNN. "Maybe he's not trying to persuade the masses. Maybe he's trying to speak to a more niche audience, Republicans...for example, and trying to frame the debate on his own terms."

Some observers see the networks' decision as overtly political.

Politico has the the White House as "exasperated with the major broadcast networks...for skipping out on President Barack Obama’s Thursday primetime address," while Mediaite writes that "[T]he Obama administration...is curiously not trying to publicize it too hard."

When deciding whether to interrupt programming for a live presidential address, TV executives consider a number of factors. "One factor is whether the speech is "political" in nature," writes CNN's Stelter. "Some television executives said privately on Wednesday that they perceived Obama's planned address to be more overtly political than Bush's address on immigration in 2006."

In other words, the networks, mindful of their audiences, may have shied away from what they perceived as a divisive speech.

Of course, there may be a much simpler explanation for why the networks aren't carrying Obama's speech.

November is a sweeps month for the broadcast networks, a month-long evaluation period during which ratings are measured to determine advertising rates. And Thursday night is a big programming night for the major networks.

Obama will be competing against hit shows “Scandal,” “How to Get Away With Murder,” and the fall finale for "Grey’s Anatomy" on ABC; the “Big Bang Theory” on CBS and "The Biggest Loser" on NBC, while the intensely popular Latin Grammys are also scheduled to air on Univision.

The President will also be competing with the pre-game show for Thursday Night Football. The Kansas City Chiefs play the Oakland Raiders at 8:25 p.m.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.