Senate to allow infants into the chamber

The tradition-bound institution voted to allow newborns of senators into the chamber. Though the rules change passed without issue, some senators voiced private concerns about allowing infants inside the chamber.

Alex Brandon/AP/File
Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) of Illinois, speaks at the Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses Summit in Washington on Feb. 14. A historic rules change allowing newborns of senators in the Senate chamber comes after the April 9 birth of Senator Duckworth's daughter. Duckworth is the first sitting senator in United States history to give birth while in office.

Who doesn't like babies?

No one in the Senate, apparently – at least not enough to block a historic rules change that passed Wednesday allowing the newborns of members into the chamber. Its passage without objection came despite plenty of concern, some privately aired, among senators of both parties about the threat the tiny humans pose to the Senate's cherished decorum.

"I'm not going to object to anything like that, not in this day and age," said Sen. Pat Roberts (R) of Kansas, father of three and grandfather of six. He then noted that a person can stand in the door of the cloakroom, a lounge just off the chamber, and vote. "I've done it," he said. Allowing babies on the Senate floor, he said, "I don't think is necessary."

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) of Utah, the father of six, grandfather of 14, and great-grandfather of 23, said he had "no problem" with such a rules change. "But what if there are 10 babies on the floor of the Senate?" he asked.

The inspiration for the new rule is a small bundle named Maile Pearl, born April 9 to Illinois Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) – the only sitting senator in US history to give birth. In a statement, Senator Duckworth thanked her colleagues for "helping bring the Senate into the 21st Century by recognizing that sometimes new parents also have responsibilities at work."

Their concerns and more were shared by Republicans and Democrats, according to interviews Wednesday.

"It is a big change," Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D) of Minnesota said in a telephone interview, as leaders of both parties sought to clear the new rule without objection or public discussion. The private reassurances to members of both parties, she said, have "been going on for weeks."

Teleworking is not an option in the Senate, which requires members to vote in person. So Duckworth raised a rare question that split her colleagues more along generational lines than well-worn partisan ones. Duckworth proposed changing the rules to allow senators with newborns – not just Duckworth, and not just women – to bring their babies onto the floor of the Senate.

This, recalled Senator Klobuchar, did not go entirely smoothly for the two months she privately took questions about the idea and its potential consequences – diaper changes, fussing and, notably, nursing.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R) of Arkansas, father of two, said he has no problem with the rule change. But Senator Cotton acknowledged that some of his colleagues do, "so the cloakroom might be a good compromise."

Klobuchar's answer to that suggestion noted that Duckworth lost both legs and partial use of an arm in Iraq, and mostly gets around by wheelchair.

"Yes, you can vote from the doorway of the cloakroom, but how is she going to get to the cloakroom when it's not wheelchair accessible?" she asked. Some senators proposed making an exception for Duckworth. But her allies said the Senate should make work easier for new parents. "We believe strongly, and she did, that it should be a permanent rules change."

Having 10 babies on the Senate floor, as Senator Hatch suggested, "would be a delight," Klobuchar said.

"We could only wish we had 10 babies on the floor. That would be a delight," retorted Klobuchar, noting that such a conflagration would probably mean more young senators had been elected in a body where the average age of members tops 60.

There was more, voiced privately, Klobuchar said – including whether Duckworth intended to change Maile's diaper or nurse her new baby on the Senate floor.

Most senators, though, were supportive, Klobuchar said. Majority leader Mitch McConnell and Rules Committee Chairman Roy Blunt (R) of Missouri, both fathers, helped or did not stand in the way. Senator McConnell did not answer a reporter's question Wednesday about whether he had any concerns about babies on the Senate floor.

Several others were happy to voice support for the rules change, and could not resist taking a jab at their colleagues.

"Why would I object to it? We have plenty of babies on the floor," joked Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida.

But there still was some confusion.

Just after the unanimous vote, Sen. Dick Durbin (D) of Illinois said it would do the tradition-bound Senate some good to see "a diaper bag next to one of these brass spittoons, which sit on the floor, thank goodness, never used."

Diaper bags are generally used to carry clean diapers and other supplies when parents and babies go out. Sometimes, they hold dirty naps until they can be disposed of.

Sen. James Inhofe (R) of Oklahoma took issue with Senator Durbin's comment, saying: "They don't use diaper bags anymore. They're disposable diapers."

This article was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Senate to allow infants into the chamber
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today