Trump to take on welfare, but not all Republicans are on board

After celebrating the passage of a major tax reform bill, President Trump eyes welfare reform, though some Republicans are hesitant to scale back welfare programs during a congressional election year.

Evan Vucci/AP/File
Before signing an executive order, President Trump speaks to those gathered in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington. After the passage of major tax reform legislation, White House aides say Mr. Trump is looking to tackle welfare next.

Emboldened by his victory in the passage of the biggest US tax overhaul in decades, President Trump now wants to rein in social welfare programs even though some Republicans are wary of tackling the volatile issue in a congressional election year.

A White House-led drive to downsize government aid programs such as food stamps and housing subsidies would energize conservative campaign donors whose support Republicans are counting on ahead of the November elections where the party will fight to keep control of Congress.

White House aides say Mr. Trump is eager to take on welfare. He has a willing partner in House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan, who has long had an interest in the issue.

But some Republicans believe Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell is lukewarm on the drive for revising welfare, which might face a difficult sell in the Senate where Republicans hold only a razor-thin 51-49 majority.

Democrats already are attacking Trump for identifying welfare changes as his top 2018 goal, saying they are designed to help pay for tax cuts whose benefits are skewed toward corporations and wealthy individuals and which will add an estimated $1.5 trillion to the debt over 10 years.

Trump has summoned Republican congressional leaders to the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland this weekend to discuss 2018 priorities, including welfare and a planned effort on infrastructure investment.

Conservative House Republicans are especially enthusiastic about a welfare overhaul. Freedom Caucus leader Mark Meadows (R) of North Carolina and the caucus' former leader, US Rep. Jim Jordan (R) of Ohio, have discussed it with Trump and are confident the Republican president backs their ideas, such as strengthening work requirements for food stamps.

"He definitely gets it," Representative Jordan said.

But Republicans may need to tread carefully in seeking to reduce government aid programs that benefit some of Trump's core supporters in poor, rural regions of the country.

Republican Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma said Congress had a lot on its plate in the early months of 2018, including must-pass budget legislation and he was unsure there would be the time – or political will in the Senate – to pass welfare legislation.

"First things first," Representative Cole said, adding it might be better to lay the groundwork for debate over the issue than to try enacting changes this year.

Representative Meadows said he believed a welfare overhaul had strong support among Republican lawmakers but that "convincing Mitch McConnell and the Democrats are Herculean tasks."

Other Republicans and interest groups such as the US Chamber of Commerce and National Association of Manufacturers think 2018 would be better spent on infrastructure.

Trump's first major legislative victory – the tax bill – took until the end of 2017. But handing out tax breaks might be far easier than revamping welfare assistance that benefits millions of American families.

Last year, there were more than 42 million people in nearly 21 million US households receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, benefits, which are known as food stamps, according to the US Department of Agriculture.

They cost taxpayers about $58 billion.

Trump's budget proposal last year called for cutting more than $192 billion from SNAP over a decade.

The president also proposed deep cuts to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, which last year provided aid to 1.1 million families.

Democratic strategist Doug Thornell said a push on welfare could trigger a political backlash for Republicans from elderly and blue-collar voters in the November congressional elections.

Mr. Thornell said it may appeal to Trump's political base "but few else. And the irony here is that it will be Trump’s base who will feel the brunt of these cuts."

Robert Doar, a poverty specialist at the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute who has been in contact with Trump administration officials about policy ideas, urged an incremental approach.

Although Mr. Doar said he did not know what policies the administration would ultimately back, he said Trump could encourage people to get jobs by reducing the length of their qualification for government aid and imposing stricter reviews of their efforts to find work.

He said Congress could pass legislation cutting benefits for people who fail to make enough effort to find jobs or do volunteer work.

Some have argued that food stamp beneficiaries, for example, already include a high rate of people who hold jobs but are unable to make ends meet.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Trump to take on welfare, but not all Republicans are on board
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today