What about Trump's policies? An analysis of his tax plan.

A new analysis of Donald Trump's tax plan notes some interesting ideas, but takes issue with the accuracy of its claims.

Shannon Stapleton/Reuters
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a news conference to reveal his tax policy at Trump Tower in New York in September.

A nonpartisan review of the tax reform plan Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump unveiled in September notes some positives, but also raises serious questions about its economic impact.

In a 32-page report released Tuesday, the Tax Policy Center gave Mr. Trump credit for a plan that would “boost incentives to work, save, and invest and that has the potential to simplify the tax code.”

While much of Trump’s plan resembles proposals by other candidates, including Jeb Bush, there were some novel elements in the document. For example, the Trump plan would tax the future profits of foreign subsidiaries of United States companies when they were earned instead of taxing them when the money is brought back to the US. 

“It was interesting for a Republican to be proposing eliminating deferral,” said TPC Director Leonard Burman. “Virtually all of the other Republican plans would go in the other direction and say foreign profits would be exempt from US tax.” 

But the TPC study sharply disagrees with candidate Trump’s statement that his tax plan would grow the economy “at a level that it hasn’t seen for decades.” The TPC study also takes issue with the statement on the Trump campaign website that the tax proposals would not “add to our debt and deficit, which are already too large.”

The Trump plan would chop tax rates for individuals and businesses, boost the standard deduction to nearly four times its current level, and repeal estate and gift taxes. The result, Mr. Burman says, “is a very large revenue loss” for the US Treasury. 

TPC calculates that the Trump tax plan would reduce federal receipts by $9.5 trillion between 2016 and 2026. In the following 10 years, the revenue loss would be $15 trillion.

“Without implausibly large spending cuts – 82 percent of discretionary spending, 92 percent of Medicare, something like that – the deficits would balloon and would push up interest rates, increase the cost of capital, and almost surely hurt the economy in the long run,” Burman said.

In announcing his tax plan, Trump said the reforms he proposed would “cost me a fortune.” He also said there would “be people in the very upper echelon that won’t be thrilled with this.”

But Burman contradicted this, noting that the benefits of his tax cutting plan “skewed heavily to high income people.”

Overall, Trump’s tax plan would cut taxes by an average of about $5,100. The highest income taxpayers, with incomes over $3.7 million in 2015 dollars, would get a tax cut of $1.3 million.

Candidate Trump proposes cutting the top corporate tax rate to 15 percent, a rate that would also apply to individual income that passes through from partnerships. That is well below the 25 percent top rate Trump proposes for individuals and potentially what Burman called “a giant loophole.” Individuals in the 20 or 25 percent tax bracket under the Trump plan would have an incentive to turn themselves into unincorporated business to save on taxes.    

TPC cautioned that it had to make some assumptions on technical issues in estimating the impact of the Trump tax plan, since it contacted the Trump campaign several times for additional details but “never got a response,” Burman said. 

Lack of response from a campaign is not unusual, said TPC tax lawyer Steve Rosenthal.  Often campaigns fail to get back with additional tax policy details because “they don’t have them.”  

TPC released its study on Jeb Bush’s tax plans earlier in December. The organization says it also plans to release studies on Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What about Trump's policies? An analysis of his tax plan.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2015/1222/What-about-Trump-s-policies-An-analysis-of-his-tax-plan
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe