Election 'energizes' because it shows democracy is working, Obama says

After the midterm election drubbing, President Obama said he wasn't feeling 'mopey' and praised Sen. Mitch McConnell as someone who kept his political promises.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP
President Obama speaks during a news conference in the East Room of the White House Wednesday in Washington.

President Obama waxed both defiant and philosophical in a 74-minute press conference Wednesday, one day after his party lost control of the Senate in midterm elections.

Mr. Obama pledged to “try different things” to improve his working relationship with top Republicans, “whether it’s having a drink with Mitch McConnell or letting John Boehner beat me again at golf,” he said, citing the Senate and House GOP leaders.  

But the president also refused to back down from his plan to announce executive action aimed at deferring deportation for another as-yet undefined class of undocumented immigrants, a long-anticipated move. In 2012, the Obama administration deferred deportations for immigrants brought into the US illegally as children, known as Dreamers.

Obama said that acting on his own would not preclude Congress from acting, and that whatever action he takes would be replaced by what Congress does.

“You send me a bill that I can sign, and those executive actions go away,” the president told reporters in the East Room of the White House. “That’s a commitment I made not just to the American people and to businesses and evangelical community and law enforcement folks and everybody who’s looked at this issue and thinks that we need immigration reform, that’s a commitment that I also made to John Boehner – that I would act in the absence of action by Congress.” 

Obama said he would announce his immigration move before the end of the year.

Senator McConnell of Kentucky, likely the next Senate majority leader, said in a separate press conference just before Obama’s that executive action on immigration would “poison the well” for bipartisan efforts on the issue.

When told what McConnell had said, Obama seemed undeterred. He also resisted efforts by reporters to get him to characterize Tuesday’s election results – after his famous comment four years ago, when he described the 2010 midterm result as a “shellacking" for Democrats. On Tuesday, Republicans gained at least seven Senate seats – more than enough to retake the upper chamber after eight years in the minority. Republicans also gained at least 12 House seats and won three governorships in blue states. 

Instead, Obama described himself as “optimistic” about the nation’s future, and energized, even after an election that was seen as a slap at his presidency.

“Maybe I’m just getting older – I don't know,” he said. The election result “doesn't make me mopey. It energizes me because it means that this democracy is working.”

He credited the Republicans for running “good campaigns” and said he felt the American people had sent a message, as they had for the last several elections: that the people they send to Washington need to work hard and “get the job done.”

But, he added, as president, he has a unique responsibility to try to make Washington work.

“So, to everyone who voted, I want you to know that I hear you,” Obama said. “To the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process yesterday, I hear you, too.”

When asked if it was time for him to have a drink with McConnell – after joking about it at last year’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner – he suggested a certain beverage McConnell's home state is famous for.

“You know, actually, I would enjoy having some Kentucky bourbon with Mitch McConnell,” Obama said.

Then he took the opportunity to say nice things about the Republicans’ Senate leader.

“He has always been very straightforward with me,” Obama said. “To his credit, he has never made a promise that he couldn’t deliver.”

Obama added that McConnell has always given him “realistic assessments” of what he can get through his caucus and what he can’t – “and so I think we can have a productive relationship.”

On Friday, the president is hosting Republican and Democratic congressional leaders at the White House to, as he put it, “chart a new course forward.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.