Obama's health-care law saved Americans $2.1 billion: Is it working?

A government report shows that rules in Obama's health-care law saved consumers $2.1 billion in premiums last year. It shows that states are using the law to their advantage, experts say. 

Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP/File
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius speaks at HHS headquarters in Washington in this February file photo.

President Obama's health-care reform law saved American consumers $2.1 billion on health insurance premiums in the past year, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius said Tuesday. It is proof, she said, that the program is helping to make "the insurance marketplace more transparent and more competitive."

In the overall picture, the savings are modest, but they offer a degree of assurance that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) – ridiculed by many conservatives as big-government financial disaster – can deliver on some promises of bringing down high health-care costs, experts say.  

Moreover, they offer a window on how states have begun to implement various cost-saving measures within the law with some success.

The reforms have "bolstered states’ exercise of their authority," says Brent Fulton, assistant adjunct professor of health economics and policy at University of California, Berkeley.  

The Rate Review Program strengthened the capacity of states to review – and reject – proposed insurance-rate increases of more than 10 percent. This saved Americans $1 billion on proposed rate increases that were either reduced or withdrawn during the review process, according to the Health and Human Services report.

The Medical Loss Ratio stipulates that insurance companies that provide individual and small-group plans must spend at least 80 percent of premium dollars on health-care benefits and only 20 percent on administrative costs and profits. Companies that spend less than 80 percent on health-care benefits must provide rebates to their customers. The additional $1.1 billion in savings came through this so-called 80/20 rule. 

The "report shows that these rules are beginning to work,” Secretary Sebelius said in a statement 

An April report by the Kaiser Family Foundation, which forecast the savings announced Tuesday, agreed: “While these provisions of the ACA are not likely to solve the problem of rising health insurance premiums or do much to restrain underlying health care costs over the longer term, they can help to ensure that consumers and businesses get greater value for their premium dollar.” 

Health-care providers are the main drivers of health-care costs, with the bulk of premiums going to new technologies, treatments, and drugs, says Dr. Fulton. Costs go up when high-cost providers exercise their market power, but the new law could give insurance companies more leverage in negotiating rate increases, he adds.

Although the main goal of the ACA was to expand insurance coverage to the uninsured, affordability remains a major issue. And in the end, the affordability aspects of the law will be judged by a simple measure, Fulton says: “Can the average family afford the average health insurance premiums?” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama's health-care law saved Americans $2.1 billion: Is it working?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today