How to topple Islamic State? 3 strengths that can be turned to weaknesses.

Here are the top three strengths of Islamic State fighters – and how these strengths could be used against them:

3. The use of social media is also a considerable Islamic State strength

This undated image posted on AlKeir_News, a Jihadist militant Twitter page, in November 2014, shows, according to them, Sunni Muslim prisoners from the Syrian Shueitat tribes, held by the Islamic State group at unknown place in Syria.

The group has shown the ability to use social media to spread and legitimize its ideology and goals, warns Brookings. It also uses the medium to fundraise and recruit young jihadists from far-flung countries like the United States.

Indeed, “through a network of provincial-level accounts and several central media departments, the Islamic State had significantly outperformed any other militant group on Twitter,” through August, 2014.

The militants' “coordinated release of particularly significant content” has earned them an “impressively large viewership,” Lister adds. One YouTube video the group released was viewed by 57,000 people and redistributed at an average of 807 tweets per hour.

They have also increasingly focused on English-language production of social media. 

But the group's widespread use of social networks also makes it vulnerable to undermining and attack. The group’s bitter battle with Al Qaeda, for example, played out online, and was harmful to Islamic State interests.

The US could counter the group's online presence and “challenge the organizations religio-political doctrine through ‘mole’ accounts within the jihad community online,” the report notes.

The US began an aggressive attack on the militants' social media presence in August, taking down many of its Twitter accounts, though this also has the impact of removing an “extremely valuable source of intelligence,” argues Lister. 

Using paid moles with extensive knowledge of Islamic creed and jurisprudence to infiltrate Islamic State social media accounts “could be doubly effective,” the report concludes, “if the same sources were used to introduce divisions within the broader online jihadi community.”

3 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.