The stark message behind Mueller indictment of 13 Russians

The Russian nationals, as well as three Russian organizations, were charged with meddling in the 2016 US election.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP
A reporter raises her hands to ask a question of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, after he announced that the office of special counsel Robert Mueller says a grand jury has charged 13 Russian nationals and several Russian entities, Feb. 16, 2018, in Washington. The defendants are accused of violating US criminal laws to interfere with American elections and the political process.

Special counsel Robert Mueller on Friday indicted 13 Russians, and three Russian organizations, with meddling in the 2016 US election.

The charges centered on the alleged use of social media to sow political discord, via inserting politically charged messages into the stream of American electronic discourse. But they dealt with physical actions as well: Russians attempted to organize rallies in the US, and at one point paid for a demonstration that included a fake prison cage housing someone portraying Hillary Clinton.

Underlying the allegations was this stark message: A foreign power is attempting to take advantage of America’s stark, widening political and demographic divisions to undermine the nation’s great strength of free expression and debate.

Also, the surprise nature of the indictment emphasized the difficulty, and perhaps the futility, of predicting where Mr. Mueller’s investigation might lead. He and his investigators obviously have vast amounts of information that aren’t public. There have been no leaks attributable to his organization. There will be more such big news surprises to come.

“The special counsel’s investigation is ongoing,” Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said in announcing the indictment.

In sum, the indictment charges the Internet Research Agency, a group operating out of St. Petersburg, with paying for social media ads and organizing fake social media posts that dealt with the US election since 2014.

By early to mid-2016, the group decided that it would focus on defeating Hillary Clinton, by supporting Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders in upcoming votes, according to the indictment.

The Russian operation was dubbed the “translator project” and had a budget of about $1.2 million per month. It dealt directly with many Americans, but those Americans didn’t know who they were dealing with, according to the Justice Department. All cooperation, including some cooperation from Trump campaign officials, was “unwitting,” according to the indictment.

Specialists, divided into teams that worked day and night shifts, produced hundreds of media posts, such as “Ohio wants Hillary 4 prison!” and “Among all the candidates only Donald Trump is the one and only one who can defend the police from terrorists,” said the Justice Department.

The indictment is likely to make it much more difficult for President Trump to downplay the Russia investigation as a “witch hunt” or “Democrat hoax,” as he has in the past. The Justice Department allegations are highly detailed and appear backed up by copious evidence, including document and electronic media trails.

Indeed, the White House did not dismiss the account. A statement said that Mr. Trump had been briefed on the findings and that the indictment proved “that there was NO COLLUSION between the Trump campaign and Russia and that the outcome of the election was not changed or affected.”

In announcing the indictment, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein had said that all the Americans named in the document had been unwitting participants, and that it contained no evidence that any of the social media posts had thrown the 2016 vote.

But Rosenstein’s comment was pointedly limited to today’s indictment. Given today’s events, what else does Mueller have? It was difficult to not read a bit into the press conference, and see it as the special counsel and the Justice Department quietly demonstrating that they will continue to go about their jobs despite Trump tweets questioning their competence.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to The stark message behind Mueller indictment of 13 Russians
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today