Why the 'Happy Birthday' song can now be sung for free

A judge ruled Tuesday that royalties no longer are owed when “Happy Birthday To You" is sung in a commercial setting.

REUTERS/University of Louisville/Handout
Sheet music for the song Good Morning To All (aka the Happy Birthday song) is seen in an undated photo provided by the University of Louisville, Kentucky. A college librarian in Kentucky has found the 19th-century manuscript of a musical number that gave rise to one of the most widely performed songs in the world, "Happy Birthday to You," University of Louisville officials said.

The song “Happy Birthday To You,” has proven to be worth millions.

US District Judge George H. King found Tuesday that the song is now entirely in the public domain, because the original copyright bought in 1988 by Warner/Chappell Music Inc. for $15 million from Clayton F. Summy Co. who originally obtained the copyright from the song’s writers, only covered specific piano arrangements of the song and not the lyrics themselves.

“‘Happy Birthday’ is finally free after 80 years,” Randall Newman, one of the plantiffs’ attorneys, told the Los Angeles Times.

Warner/Chappell has said it doesn't try to collect royalties from just anyone singing the song but those who use it in a commercial enterprise, reports the Associated Press.

By making one of the most widely sung songs in the world fair game, the music publishing company Warner/Chappell will lose $2 million a year in reported revenue. “We are looking at the court’s lengthy opinion and considering our options,” Warner/Chappell said in a statement after Tuesday’s ruling.

Judge King’s decision comes from a lawsuit filed two years ago by Good Morning to You Corp., which challenged the copyright arguing that the song should be “dedicated to public use and in the public domain.”

Before giving his decision, King went into great detail about the history of the song. Originally written by sisters Mildred and Patty Hill sometime before 1893, the sisters then assigned the rights of the song to Summy, who later published them in a book titled ‘Song Stories for the Kindergarten.’

However, the full lyrics themselves never appeared in print until 1911, says King.

“Because Summy Co. never acquired the rights to the ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics, defendants, as Summy Co.’s purported successors-in-interest, do not own a valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics,” King ultimately explained in his 43-page ruling.

Not only is the song worth millions, but according to Guinness World Records, the ‘Happy Birthday’ lyrics have also become the most famous lyrics in the world.

In another recent music copyrights case, Robin Thicke was faced a lawsuit claiming that his hit ‘Blurred Lines’ had copied elements of songs by Marvin Gaye and George Clinton. Attorneys for Thicke, and the song’s collaborators Pharrell Williams and T.I., asked a federal judge to determine the song’s originality once and for all.

“Plantiffs created a hit and did it without copying anyone else’s composition,” the counter lawsuit reads.  "The basis of the Gaye defendants' claims is that 'Blurred Lines' and 'Got to Give It Up' 'feel' or 'sound' the same," the lawsuit states. "Being reminiscent of a 'sound' is not copyright infringement. The intent in producing 'Blurred Lines' was to evoke an era."

“I know the difference between inspiration and theft,” Thicke explained in an interview with the New York Times. “I’m constantly inspired, but I would never steal.”

Thicke and Williams eventually lost the case, and a Los Angeles jury awarded Gaye’s estate $4 million in damages plus $3.4 million in profits made from the copyright infringement.

Material from the Associated Press was used in this story. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.