Election Day 2013: six of the most riveting votes

In the off-year elections Nov. 5, Americans are voting to elect two governors and 305 mayors and decide numerous ballot initiatives. Here are six of the day's most gripping votes.

Virginia: Will it elect a Democratic governor?

AP Photo/News & Daily Advance, Sam O'Keefe
Gina Wright casts her votes in the Nov. 5 election at the Rustburg Elementary School in Rustburg, Va. Democrat Terry McAuliffe and Republican Ken Cuccinelli are running to succeed term-limited Gov. Bob McDonnell for a four-year term starting in January.

In a state that has become a battleground in presidential politics, former Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe is facing off against Virginia's Republican attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli. Mr. McAuliffe is backed by his close friends Bill and Hillary Clinton, while Florida Sen. Marco Rubio (R) and former Texas Rep. Ron Paul are stumping for Mr. Cuccinelli.

Democrats are calling the race a "tea party referendum," and Republicans are calling it an "Obamacare referendum," suggesting that its outcome will say more about national politics than state-level issues. Others have suggested that the high number of government workers living in Virginia may be nursing ire toward the Republican Party, blaming it for the recent government shutdown. That could work against Cuccinelli, who indeed has lagged behind McAuliffe in most polls.

It has been such an ugly race that The Roanoke Times and the Richmond Times-Dispatch have both declined to endorse either candidate. "The major-party candidates have earned the citizenry's derision. The third-party alternative has run a more exemplary race yet does not qualify as a suitable option," the Times-Dispatch said. "We cannot in good conscience endorse a candidate for governor."

4 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.