Election Day 2013: six of the most riveting votes

In the off-year elections Nov. 5, Americans are voting to elect two governors and 305 mayors and decide numerous ballot initiatives. Here are six of the day's most gripping votes.

Colorado: For school financing, scrap and start over?

AP Photo/Brennan Linsley
In this Oct. 29, 2013, photo, consultant Brent Haldiman talks at a coffee shop in Denver about the upcoming vote on a statewide ballot measure to raise taxes to fund education. The income tax question to be decided by Colorado voters sets up a watershed change for how public schools are funded and could be the largest voter-approved tax hike in state history.

Colorado's "Future School Finance Act" would overhaul financing for public schools, which currently accounts for 43 percent of the state's general fund spending. If voters agree, the initiative would raise $1 billion from taxpayers, target extra funds to kids with the greatest learning needs, and redistribute funds to benefit poor districts. As part of these reforms, kindergarten would become an all-day experience, and preschool would be offered for at-risk 4-year-olds.

The measure, which has already been approved by the legislature but also has to be voted on by residents, has attracted support from US Education Secretary Arne Duncan, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, among others. State Republicans have opposed it, as well as others who see it as an expensive new tax that won't necessarily improve education.

Through a fluke of disconnected policies, Colorado's poorest districts currently tax themselves at the highest rates, yet receive the least amount of state support for schools. And in the past four years, spending has been cut so that Colorado now spends $2,000 less per student than the average US state.

3 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.