For safer schools, resource officers focus on building trust

(AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, file)
A candlelight vigil on Feb. 15, 2018 for the victims of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla.

Dear Readers,

With many schools across the country already in session or about to start, educators are busy setting priorities for the year. Even before the shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, last weekend, the safety of students was top among them.
 
Judging by this week’s news that the sale of bulletproof backpacks skyrocketed, it’s also on the minds of parents. Data was also released last month that suggests that online bullying has ticked up.
 
Among the less flashy, but important, approaches to school safety is that of students having trusted adults to turn to with concerns. Some districts are adapting the role of school resource officers to help with that.
 
That idea came up earlier this year at the national meeting of the Education Writers Association. On one panel, Akil Hamm, the chief of police for Baltimore City Public Schools, described how the city’s approach has changed in recent years. The SROs are thought of as positive role models, being assigned to schools where they themselves attended, for example, and taking on mentoring roles.
 
“When you do that, kids come to us. They tell us, ‘Hey, so-and-so has a gun.’ ‘There’s going to be a fight at this place, at this time.’ ‘This person is posting stuff on social media,’” Mr. Hamm said. “When you have a relationship with kids and they trust you, they want to tell you.”
 
Elsewhere, Congress is reportedly looking into new school safety measures in the wake of the recent shootings, and districts are continuing to refine their approaches as the academic year kicks off. We will be keeping an eye on the developments.
 

Kim Campbell, culture and education editor 

Please sign up for the Culture & Learning newsletters, here.
For a student discount subscription to The Monitor visit: csmonitor.com/student.

Why We Wrote This

School resource officers are increasingly seen as positive role models, being assigned to schools where they themselves attended, for example, and taking on mentoring roles.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.