With new lawyer, Britney Spears renews plea to end conservatorship

A judge approved Britney Spears’ request to hire an attorney of her own choosing after the pop star recounted her time under her conservatorship, which she called abusive. The attorney, Mathew Rosengart, called on Ms. Spears’ father to resign as her conservator.

Chris Pizzello/AP
Britney Spears' newly appointed lawyer Mathew Rosengart leaves the Stanley Mosk Courthouse after a hearing about Ms. Spears' conservatorship, July 14, 2021, in Los Angeles. Ms. Spears says she intends to press charges against her father for "conservatorship abuse."

A judge allowed Britney Spears to hire an attorney of her choosing at a hearing Wednesday in which she broke down in tears after describing the “cruelty” of her conservatorship.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Brenda Penny approved Ms. Spears hiring former federal prosecutor Mathew Rosengart, who called on Ms. Spears’ father, James Spears, to immediately resign as her conservator.

“The question remains, why is he involved,” Mr. Rosengart said outside the courthouse.

Ms. Spears, taking part in the hearing by phone, told the judge she approved of Mr. Rosengart after several conversations with him. She then asked to address the court, but asked that the courtroom be cleared.

As Mr. Rosengart began to argue for a private hearing, Ms. Spears interrupted him to say “I can talk with it open.”

“My dad needs to be removed today,” she said, adding that she would like to see him charged with abusing his position.

She spoke so rapidly she was at times difficult for the court reporter and the dozens of media members in the courtroom to understand.

She said she wanted the conservatorship to end immediately but not if it required going through any more “stupid” evaluations. She said she did not want another opportunity for “people to question my intelligence for the millionth time.”

She described being denied things as basic as coffee, her driver’s license, and her “hair vitamins” by the conservatorship.

“If this is not abuse, I don’t know what is,” Ms. Spears said.

She recalled that “I thought they were trying to kill me” in the early years of the conservatorship as she was being overworked and constantly examined.

She began to sob as she talked about taking comfort in a therapy dog when she felt abandoned by her family.

Mr. Spears would not be stepping down as Mr. Rosengart challenged, his attorney Vivian Thoreen said in court, adding that he has only ever had his daughter’s best interests in mind.

Ms. Thoreen said Ms. Spears had many inaccurate beliefs, among them that “her father is responsible for all the bad things that have happened to her.”

“Whether it’s misinformation, lack of correction, or being wrongly advised, I don’t know,” Ms. Thoreen said.

Ms. Thoreen emphasized that for nearly two years Mr. Spears has had control only over his daughter’s money, ceding power over her life choices to a court-appointed professional, Jodi Montgomery.

Ms. Thoreen argued that an evidentiary hearing was necessary to look into the allegations that Ms. Spears made at the June 23 hearing, including that she was being forced to take medications and use an intra-uterine device for birth control.

Ms. Thoreen said she found it odd Ms. Spears would describe those circumstances, which the pop star called “abusive,” then approve of Ms. Montgomery continuing in her role as overseer.

Ms. Montgomery’s lawyer, Lauriann Wright, responded that the last thing Ms. Spears needed was to be put on the stand and cross-examined over the truth of what she said during her emotional testimony.

“I don’t think it’s a secret that we’re dealing with someone with mental illness,” Ms. Wright said.

Ms. Wright added that it’s been “strongly recommended by her medical team that her father Mr. Spears needs to be off the conservatorship.”

Ms. Spears has been under court supervision since February 2008. She was in the midst of a public meltdown at the time and her family sought the conservatorship for her protection.

She has had throughout the proceedings a court-appointed attorney to represent her interests, Samuel Ingham III, but he resigned after the dramatic hearing three weeks ago in which the pop star told Ms. Penny: “I just want my life back.”

Fans from the #FreeBritney movement outside the courthouse cheered the decision to appoint Mr. Rosengart, then cheered Mr. Rosengart himself when he walked out.

In court, he called into question whether the conservatorship should ever have been put into place, and said he and a team of attorneys from his firm would be taking a close look at the details of the arrangement.

“This is not working,” Mr. Rosengart said. “We know that.”

Florida congressman Matt Gaetz made a brief appearance addressing supporters of Ms. Spears outside the downtown Los Angeles courthouse, at one point shouting “Free Britney!”

In Washington, D.C., a group of Spears supporters demonstrated on the National Mall in support of the singer.

The case had for several years operated with little drama, though questions about how its length and the singer’s feelings about the proceedings, arose in recent years. That has culminated into intense public scrutiny of the court proceedings, which have been conducted largely in secret due to medical and private information about the singer and her condition.

There has also been focus on the complex network of lawyers and others involved in the conservatorship.

Ms. Penny again gave little indication of what moves she’ll make next, scheduling another hearing for late September and expressing hope that the warring factions will find common ground for Ms. Spears’ sake.

“Everybody should be working collaboratively,” the judge said. “It’s not about anybody else, it’s about her.”

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.