Britney Spears speaks out. Will her 13-year conservatorship end?

Pop star Britney Spears said her court-ordered conservatorship is abusive and wants to manage her own affairs and assets worth $60 million. Ending the legal arrangement that has controlled her life since 2008 will be difficult, legal experts say.

Chris Pizzello/AP
Fans of Britney Spears and members of the press gather outside a court in Los Angeles where a hearing over Ms. Spears' conservatorship was held on June 23, 2021. Ms. Spears asked the judge overseeing her court-appointed conservatorship for a loosening of restrictions.

Britney Spears has made clear how frustrated she is with the legal arrangement that has controlled her life for 13 years, but the singer will need patience before finding freedom.

Legal experts say that wanting out of a court-appointed conservatorship is easier said than done. Ms. Spears, now 39, will have to convince the judge that she is capable of managing her personal affairs and assets worth around $60 million, according to court documents.

“Once a person is under a conservatorship it’s difficult to get out of it because the court does not want to remove those protections only to have the conservatee taken advantage of,” said Los Angeles-based family lawyer Christopher Melcher.

“They would have to demonstrate that it’s no longer necessary,” Mr. Melcher added.

In profanity laced remarks to the judge overseeing her case, Ms. Spears on Wednesday described the conservatorship as abusive, stupid, embarrassing, and demoralizing.

The “Piece of Me” singer begged for the arrangement to be ended without having to undergo more psychological testing.

“I don’t want to be evaluated, to be sat in a room with people four hours a day like they did to me before,” she said. “If I can work and provide money and work for myself and pay other people – it makes no sense.”

The conservatorship began in 2008 when Ms. Spears reportedly suffered a mental health breakdown. The nature of her mental illness has never been disclosed. A year later she made a career comeback, released new albums, and performed live for 10 years until late 2018.

Judge Brenda Penny praised Ms. Spears for her courage in speaking out but said on Wednesday that Ms. Spears needs to submit a petition to the court requesting the termination of the conservatorship before any next steps could be taken. No new dates were set.

Under the terms of conservatorships in California, the judge would usually send a court-appointed investigator to speak with Ms. Spears and other interested parties, including the singer’s parents Jamie and Lynne Spears, her care manager, and the financial institution that manages her business affairs. The judge would make the final decision.

“Everybody thinks that you simply walk into court with your case and the judge is going to hear me and the judge is going to understand that what I want is what is right, and they’re going to give that to me. And it simply doesn’t work that way,” said Scott Rahn, an attorney with expertise in trusts and conservatorships.

“It has to be warranted,” Mr. Rahn added.

Ms. Spears may be more successful at loosening of some of the restrictions she now faces. She mentioned wanting to choose her own attorney, marry, and have another baby, have her nails and hair done, and have a therapist come to her rather than vice versa.

Lisa MacCarley, a probate and conservatorship lawyer who supports the #FreeBritney movement, said Ms. Spears had been “treated shabbily” under the conservatorship.

“Britney Spears needs to get into an office of a competent and independent legal adviser and weigh her options,” Ms. MacCarley said.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.