Did misogyny derail Hillary Clinton's bid for president?

In her first interview since losing the 2016 election, the former Democratic presidential candidate said it did. 

Mary Altaffer/AP
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks to New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof during the Women in the World Summit at Lincoln Center in New York, April 6, 2017. In her first interview since she lost the 2016 presidential election, Mrs. Clinton said misogyny played a role in her loss.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said misogyny "certainly" played a role in her US presidential election defeat by Republican rival Donald Trump.

In her first interview since losing the 2016 US election, Mrs. Clinton said the prospect of electing the first woman president was exciting for some Americans, but threatening to others.

"Certainly, misogyny played a role. And that just has to be admitted," Clinton told an audience of about 3,000 people at the Women in the World Summit in New York on Thursday.

"Part of the bullying and part of the name calling ... is to crush your spirit and feel inadequate. And I just refused to do that – and that infuriated everyone," Clinton said in the interview, conducted by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.

Clinton said she didn't understand the Trump administration's "commitment to hurt so many people" and was concerned women's rights around the world were under threat.

"The targeting of women – which is what is going on – is absolutely beyond any political agenda," Clinton said. "The more we support women, the more we support democracy.... Women's issues are national security issues around the world."

The State Department said on Monday it was ending US funding for the United Nations Population Fund, the international body's agency focused on family planning as well as maternal and child health in more than 150 countries.

It comes after Mr. Trump in January reinstated the so-called Mexico City Policy that withholds US funding for international organizations that perform abortions or provide information about abortion.

Clinton said she has no intention of another run for public office and said she is writing a book that, in part, delves into what derailed her attempt to become America's first woman president.

"For people who are interested in this, the nearly 66 million people who voted for me, I want to give as clear and as credible an explanation as I can," she said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Did misogyny derail Hillary Clinton's bid for president?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today