Obama mulls removing NSA chief – while Trump ponders promoting him

Adm. Michael Rogers, who heads both the National Security Agency and US Cyber Command, has been criticized for failing to thwart major security breaches since his appointment in 2014.

Gary Cameron/Reuters/File
National Security Agency (NSA) director Adm. Michael Rogers participates in a session at the third annual Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington on Sept. 8.

At the urging of top military and intelligence officials, the lame-duck Obama administration is considering relieving a high-ranking intelligence official of his duties, even as US President-elect Donald Trump ponders the possibility of promoting him.

Adm. Michael Rogers, who steers both the National Security Agency (NSA) and US Cyber Command in a "dual-hat" arrangement, has been criticized for failing to thwart major security breaches since his appointment in 2014 after the disclosures of classified information by former contractor Edward Snowden. And he has been at the center of a debate over whether his duties should be divvied between two separate chains of command.

Citing several unnamed officials, The Washington Post reported Saturday that Defense Secretary Ash Carter and Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper Jr. had recommended in a letter last month, before the election, that Admiral Rogers be let go. Mr. Carter was primarily concerned with Rogers' performance, while Mr. Clapper – who tendered his resignation last week – sought to split Rogers' leadership roles into two, making the NSA chief a civilian position, according to the report.

Mr. Trump's transition team had been considering Rogers as the leading candidate to follow Clapper as DNI, as the Wall Street Journal reported Friday, before the Post's revelation. Rogers met with Trump on Thursday at Trump Tower in New York, where others being considered for appointments have met with the president-elect. 

The DNI oversees 17 spy agencies and delivers a daily briefing to the president. That relationship could prove complicated if Trump selects Rogers, however, given that the two have disagreed publicly about evidence of Russian involvement in hacking during the US elections. Just last week, Rogers repeated the intelligence community's findings that the Kremlin had been trying to meddle in the American democratic process by hacking email accounts associated with the Democratic National Committee.

"This was a conscious effort by a nation state to attempt to achieve a specific effect," Rogers said during a Q-and-A in Washington.

Trump, meanwhile, who has said he knows better than military officials, insisted that evidence of Russian involvement remains inconclusive.

The recommendation to remove Rogers was unrelated to Trump's interest in hiring him, The New York Times reported, citing unnamed intelligence and administration officials. One anonymous source suggested there could be a political motivation in leaking the information.

Although the Obama administration has pushed to split the NSA and Cyber Command leadership into two distinct roles, some members of Congress, led by Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Sen. John McCain (R) of Arizona, have pushed back. They argue that Cyber Command would be rendered ineffective if deprived of access to NSA resources.

Former Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, who served on the Select Committee on Intelligence, was among other Republicans who praised Rogers.

"When it comes to the world of cyber, there’s nobody more capable than Mike Rogers in the military world today," he told the Post.

House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R) of California said in a statement late Saturday that he had asked Carter and Clapper to appear before the committee to "discuss the veracity of press reports" that they had recommended Rogers be removed.

"Since Adm. Rogers was appointed as NSA director in April 2014, I have been consistently impressed with his leadership and accomplishments," Representative Nunes said in the letter, asking Carter and Clapper to respond by 5 p.m. Monday with proposed dates and times for their testimony.

Additionally, Nunes said he would plan to hold an open hearing soon to discuss the prospect of separating the NSA from Cyber Command.

Material from The Associated Press and Reuters was included in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama mulls removing NSA chief – while Trump ponders promoting him
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today