What's bringing sharks to the Carolinas?

Several experts talked about what could be causing the increase in shark attacks – and what can be done about it.

Laura I. Hefty/AP
People surround and attend to a 68-year-old man that was bit by a shark in waist-deep water off Ocracoke Island, N.C. Wednesday. Experts say warmer temperatures and stronger currents are among explanations for the recent string of shark attacks in the Carolinas.

The attack by a shark on former Boston Herald editor-in-chief Andrew Costello marks the seventh such incident in North Carolina this year, and the 10th in the Carolinas. Though the year is just halfway over, the Carolinas have already surpassed their average of six shark attacks per year, CNN reported.

George Burgess, director of the International Shark Attack File at the Florida Museum of Natural History, laid out for National Geographic the “perfect storm” of ecological factors most likely working in tandem to build an environment where shark attacks abound, including rising temperatures and unsafe fishing practices. There are, however, measures people can take to reduce the likelihood of attracting sharks.

Warm weather, National Geographic reported, is attractive to both sharks and swimmers – and North Carolina got warm early this year. Shark attacks in the state are most common when the water hits about 80 degrees Fahrenheit, which first happened in April. With more people at the beach cooling off in the ocean, and more sharks swimming in pursuit of warm water, the two populations are sharing more space than they are used to.

Mr. Burgess also said sharks prefer water with a higher concentration of salt. Since North Carolina has been experiencing a drought, the rainwater that usually dilutes the coastal waters has been missing, leading to saltier shorelines.

A sudden abundance of food in the area also plays a role in attracting hungry sharks – and this one, Burgess said, humans can be proactive about. While North Carolina’s coast has seen an increase in menhaden – little “bait fish” sharks pursue over long distances – due to strong currents flowing north, sharks are also attracted to fishing spots, meaning communities can mitigate danger by making sure swimming and fishing do not happen in the same place.

“There is no doubt that fishing is an attractant to sharks,” Burgess said.

As for global warming, its potential role in inviting shark attacks is debatable. Burgess said the effect it has on water temperatures is enough to draw a plausible connection between climate change and shark attacks.

“Clearly global climate change is a reality and it has resulted in warmer temperatures in certain places at certain times,” he said.

But Frank K. Schwartz, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill shark biologist, begs to differ. Mr. Schwartz also told National Geographic that temperatures and water currents tend to fluctuate too much to draw any real conclusions.

Additionally, though it may seem like lately the shark attacks have been endless, Schwartz said the numbers are really too low to do any kind of statistical analysis.

While Schwartz said most shark bites are simply the result of “being in the wrong place at the wrong time,” the Florida Museum released several pieces of advice for beach-goers.

Swimmers should avoid areas of water where bait is dropped, should not swim with open wounds or shiny objects, and should not swim “at night or during or after storms, which can make the water cloudy and churn up the bait fish that lead to shark feeding frenzies,” National Geographic reported.

In the event of an attack, the Florida Museum recommends hitting the shark in the nose, or scratching at its eyes or gills. “One should not act passively if under attack … sharks respect size and power.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.