Why shark attacks are happening in North Carolina

Although very rare, the recent spate of shark attacks in North Carolina is likely caused by warmer water and shifting currents carrying shark bait north.

Chuck Burton/AP
A helicopter flies close to the water as vacationers relax on the beach in Oak Island, N.C., June 15, 2015.

“The number of worldwide unprovoked shark attacks has grown at a steady pace since 1900,” according to a report released by shark experts at the Florida Museum of Natural History.

Four shark attacks in North Carolina in just two weeks appears to confirm the assertion.

But should we clear the water?

Not so fast.

The International Shark Attack File released by the Florida Museum of Natural History says the cause for the uptick in attacks is simple statistics: more sharks are biting humans because there are ever-growing numbers of people in the ocean, increasing the opportunity for interaction between the two species.

The Florida Museum of Natural History (in the home state of the most unprovoked shark attacks in the US per year) takes some credit, too, for the rise in recorded attacks. It reports that in the past 25 years the group has become more efficient at discovering and investigating attacks which has led to further increases in the number of recorded interactions.

Frank J. Schwartz, a shark biologist from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told National Geographic that attacks are heavily dependent on weather and currents. Two conditions, both of which occurred in North Carolina as early as April and have since persisted, are water temperature reaching 80 degrees Fahrenheit and strong currents flowing north along the coast, bringing shark bait along with it. Sharks follow these conditions, Mr. Schwartz said, coming from Florida and the Gulf of Mexico.

But Schwartz warned against statistical analysis of shark attacks. Incidences are so rare that it is difficult to identify trends or correlations. Similarly, water temperatures and currents fluctuate so much from from year to year, Schwartz said, that it is unclear whether climate change has anything to do with shark behavior.

To avoid being bitten by a shark, Schwartz recommends not behaving like prey and minimizing confusion. Sharks can mistake humans for food when visibility is low. If you are worried about sharks, stay clear of the water when it is particularly choppy and the water is murky.

Avoid splashing or wearing anything shiny, which to sharks can resemble the scales of a fish.  

Schwartz told National Geographic that most attacks are simply the result of “being in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

“Usually there is bait nearby and someone just gets in the way,” he said.

The International Shark Attack file points out that worldwide only three fatalities resulted from unprovoked attacks in 2014. Shark-related fatalities have been on the decline in the last eleven decades, even as records of attacks are on the rise. The report claims that the total deaths is “remarkably low given the billions of human-hours spent in the water each year.”

And if you still jump at the sight of a shadow in the water just remember: an ocean swimmer has only a one in 11.5 million chance of being bitten by a shark.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.