Boston Marathon bombing: Could Tsarnaev's team succeed in getting trial moved?

A federal appeals court held a hearing Thursday on whether the trial for Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev should be moved out of the city.

|
Jane Flavell Collins/AP/File
This Jan. 5, 2015 courtroom sketch shows Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, left, depicted beside US District Judge George O'Toole Jr., right, as O'Toole addresses a pool of potential jurors in a jury assembly room at the federal courthouse, in Boston.

A lawyer for Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev urged a federal appeals court Thursday to move the trial out of the city, arguing that pretrial publicity has made it impossible to find fair and impartial jurors.

“Justice has to have the appearance of justice,” Judith Mizner, a court-appointed attorney for Mr. Tsarnaev, told a three-member panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals.

Legal experts consider this a last-ditch effort by the defense team to move the trial. Tsarnaev’s lawyers have filed several such motions, which have been rejected by the trial judge. Thursday’s hearing was granted by one judge on the appeals court panel.

Rosanna Cavallaro, a law professor at Suffolk University in Boston and former state assistant attorney general, says Tsarnaev’s lawyers are unlikely to win a change of venue. But she doesn’t fault them for trying.

“The role for a defense attorney in a case like this is to challenge every aspect of the process,” Professor Cavallaro says. “That’s all they got.”

Tsarnaev has pleaded not guilty to 30 counts against him, including 17 that carry the death penalty, in connection with the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. Three people were killed and more than 260 injured when two bombs exploded near the finish line.

Jury selection for the trial is already under way. As of Wednesday afternoon, District Judge George O'Toole had provisionally qualified 61 potential jurors. The goal is to obtain 70, from which a panel of 12 jurors and six alternates is to be chosen.

The progress made in the selection process has prosecutors arguing that it is possible to seat a jury. On Thursday, prosecutor William Weinreb commended Judge O’Toole’s handling of the individual juror questioning.

“Exposure to pretrial publicity does not disqualify [people] from serving on a jury,” said Mr. Weinreb, adding that jurors could be fairly expected to form opinions based “purely on evidence presented in the courtroom.”

Tsarnaev’s defense team has repeatedly argued that he cannot get a fair trial in eastern Massachusetts because too many people believe he's guilty and have personal connections to the marathon or bombing.

“It’s that connection and the allegiance that you’re not going to see in another jurisdiction,” Ms. Mizner said in her closing remarks Thursday. “And there is nothing wrong with that. It just means this is not the place to try this case.”
 
Boston is so saturated with pretrial publicity, Mizner said, that even cement mixers at a construction site outside the federal courthouse were emblazoned with the slogan “Boston Strong.”

For months, O’Toole has insisted that a fair and impartial jury can be selected through the juror questioning process. But the process has taken far longer than expected.

Individual questioning entered its sixth week Thursday, lasting nearly four weeks longer than O'Toole had initially estimated. A string of winter storms is partly to blame for the delay. So, too, is the difficulty of selecting jurors who are not only unbiased but also open to the possibility of sentencing Tsarnaev to death – a prerequisite for all federal death penalty cases.

The appeals court decided to hear oral arguments Thursday at the request of Judge Juan Torruella, who dissented when a three-judge panel ruled in January that it had no reason to intervene in the change-of-venue matter.

The judges did not say Thursday when a ruling will be issued.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Boston Marathon bombing: Could Tsarnaev's team succeed in getting trial moved?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2015/0219/Boston-Marathon-bombing-Could-Tsarnaev-s-team-succeed-in-getting-trial-moved
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe