The view from the courthouse in the Dzokhar Tsarnaev trial

The initial phase of jury selection in the Boston Marathon bombing trial, which saw 1,200 potential jurors descend on the US district courthouse in South Boston, concluded Wednesday afternoon.

Jane Flavell Collins/AP
In this courtroom sketch, Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, second from right, is depicted with his lawyers, left, beside US District Judge George O'Toole Jr., right, as O'Toole addresses a pool of potential jurors in a jury assembly room at the federal courthouse, Monday, Jan. 5, 2015, in Boston. Tsarnaev is charged with the April 2013 attack that killed three people and injured more than 260. His trial is scheduled to begin on Jan. 26. He could face the death penalty if convicted.

The initial phase of jury selection in the trial of accused Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev concluded Wednesday afternoon.

Three days of court hearings that saw 1,200 Massachusetts citizens descend on the US district courthouse in South Boston ended today with the last group of 200 potential jurors receiving preliminary instructions from Judge George O’Toole.

Security has been tight, with US Marshals at the entrance and a Coast Guard boat — complete with a mounted machine gun on the prow — patrolling the harbor on the other side of the courthouse.

The case is roundly considered the most high-profile death penalty case in US history since the trial of Timothy McVeigh for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

The 1,200 potential jurors have been brought into the court in six groups of 200 throughout the week. Mr. Tsarnaev attended all six hearings. Tsarnaev has been seen only rarely since the bombings on April 15, 2013 — which he is accused of planning and perpetrating with his older brother, Tamerlan, who was killed in a shootout with police. A Dec. 18 status hearing in the case was his first appearance in court in almost 18 months, and his presence — and behavior — has been a focus of commentary in the trial’s first week.

Each hearing presented the scene of him at a table, flanked by his lawyers, facing hundreds of potential jurors. Yesterday, a delay in Judge O’Toole’s appearance in the room resulted in an awkward 10-minute period with Tsarnaev sitting silently in front of the crowd.

Tsarnaev appeared fidgety during the first few hearings — scratching at his face and fiddling with his hands — but seemed to grow more comfortable throughout the week. By the final hearing Wednesday afternoon, he sat calmly in his chair, either staring at his feet or at O’Toole.

O’Toole began each hearing by describing the traditional duty of jurors, before moving on to the specific procedures for the Tsarnaev case. Finally, he introduced the members of each legal team to the 200 jurors, and also ordered them to avoid all media coverage of the case until they’ve been dismissed as a potential juror.

A trial by jury, O’Toole told the potential jurors, is “one of the most fundamental principles at the core of our system of justice.”

“We need your help,” he told the final group of 200 this afternoon, “and we need your honest performance of this important duty of citizenship.”

Each juror filled out a lengthy questionnaire — a process that took hours for some – which will be used to winnow the pool down to a few hundred.

Beginning next week, the remaining potential jurors will be interviewed one-on-one by Judge O’Toole, in the presence of the prosecution and defense lawyers.

The trial is expected to start, with a 12-person jury and six alternates, on Jan. 26, and take three to four months. If the jury finds Tsarnaev guilty, it will then be asked to decide if he should be sentenced to death, or to life in prison.

Mr. Tsarnaev is charged with planning and executing a double bombing near the finish line of the Marathon on April 15, 2013. The attacks killed three people and injured more than 260. Tsarnaev is also charged with the murder of an MIT police officer in the days after the bombings.

The sidewalk outside the courthouse has been mostly empty of protesters this week – a contrast from the Dec. 18 hearing, when self-described Tsarnaev supporters briefly got into an argument with a man who was wounded in the bombing.

Tsarnaev’s defense team has entered a motion to bar any supporters from protesting outside the courthouse, saying that they espouse “outrageous conspiracy theories” — including claims that the government was responsible for the bombing and that the injuries were faked — and that their behavior could pose a “grave threat” to their client’s right to a fair trial.

On Wednesday morning, there was only one demonstrator. Kevin O’Connell, of Roslindale, Mass., said he was there to protest the FBI’s handling of its investigation into Tsarnaev’s brother, Tamerlan.

The FBI has acknowledged that Tamerlan Tsarnaev — who is suspected of carrying out the bombings with Dzhokhar — visited the Dagestan region of Russia in 2010, where authorities suspect he became radicalized. The FBI interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev in 2011 but declared that he wasn't an imminent threat.

“I’m not a [Tsarnaev] supporter,” O’Connell said, in an interview with the Monitor, “but I don’t think anyone should prevent them from doing that [protesting]. It’s America.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to The view from the courthouse in the Dzokhar Tsarnaev trial
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today