Virgin Galactic: What's known so far about SpaceShipTwo disaster

The NTSB is investigating the catastrophic explosion which destroyed Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo, billionaire Richard Branson’s plane designed for amateur astronauts. Will it bring down Branson’s dream of space tourism as well?

Brian Melley/AP
Virgin Galactic founder Richard Branson speaks at a news conference in Mojave, Calif., Saturday. Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo blew apart about 20 miles from the Mojave airfield after being released from a carrier aircraft Friday.

It could take a year before investigators know what happened to the rocket-propelled vehicle designed to take wealthy amateur astronauts to the edge of space for a few minutes of weightlessness and spectacular views.

British billionaire Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Galactic, whose SpaceShipTwo blew apart after being released from a carrier aircraft Friday, says, "We are not going to push on blindly."

John Logsdon, retired space policy director at George Washington University, puts it more bluntly. "It's a real setback to the idea that lots of people are going to be taking joyrides into the fringes of outer space any time soon," he told Fox News.

Investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) are on the scene in California’s Mojave Desert, examining scattered wreckage and waiting to talk with surviving pilot Peter Siebold, who is hospitalized with serious injuries but reportedly able to communicate. Michael Tyner Alsbury, the other test pilot, died in the accident.

Acting NTSB chairman Christopher Hart told a press conference Saturday that this is the agency’s first time leading the investigation of a space launch involving people onboard. The brief flight and accident likely were well-documented by cameras on SpaceShipTwo, carrier aircraft WhiteKnightTwo, and chase aircraft.

Among other things, the accident will focus on SpaceShipTwo’s rocket fuel. Scaled Composites, the vehicle’s designer and builder, had recently switched solid fuel types from one based on rubber to one that uses plastic pellets.

Within two minutes of its release from the carrier aircraft, it became obvious that something was wrong with SpaceShipTwo, which experienced an explosion, breaking up in flight and scattering parts over several miles of desert floor. Mr. Siebold apparently survived by parachute, but Mr. Alsbury’s body was found inside part of the aircraft.

Travel to the edge of space and beyond has never been without risk.

In the early days of the US program, rockets blew up on the launch pad or shortly after launch. Astronauts Virgil “Gus” Grissom, Edward White, and Roger Chaffee were killed in a fire aboard the Apollo 1 capsule on the ground at Cape Canaveral in 1967. Two Space Shuttles and their crews were lost during the most dangerous part of flight – Challenger during launch in 1986  and Columbia during reentry in 2003.

The potential for danger to civilian space passengers became real with the death of high school teacher Christa McAuliffe in the Challenger disaster.

Space tourism has been a dream of Mr. Branson and other entrepreneurs viewed as visionary by their investors as well as those wealthy enough to spend the $250,000 being charged to get on the waiting list of those Branson’s company called “future astronauts.”

Some 700 people have signed up, including cosmologist Stephen Hawking as well as such Hollywood figures as Justin Bieber, Ashton Kutcher, and Russell Brand. The company reports receiving $90 million from about 700 prospective passengers. So far, Branson said Saturday, no one has asked for a refund.

Branson's space tourism effort is not without critics. Writes aviation specialist Clive Irving in the Daily Beast:

“There are many consequences to this failure. Not the least is what it implies for the financing of the project. After years of delays the costs have gone beyond a billion dollars. More than a third of that money has come from Abar, an investment fund based in Abu Dhabi. (This was made available in return for an undertaking by Virgin to build a space tourism base in the Gulf.) By any measure, this accident will have set back the development program by years. Will backers want to pour ever more money into this black hole?

“From the beginning in 2004 there has always been a credibility gap between the fairground hyperbole of Branson’s formidable publicity machine and the scientific reality of the enterprise. Somehow, probably because he is such a consummate showman, Branson has been able, year after year, to override the story of continual delays, flagrant over-promises and a voracious, seemingly open-ended budget. This time it’s different.”

 “We’ve always known that commercial space travel is an incredibly hard project,” Branson acknowledges. “We’re going to learn from what went wrong.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Virgin Galactic: What's known so far about SpaceShipTwo disaster
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today