Why firefighter deaths have hit historic lows

Fewer than 65 on-duty firefighters died in 2012, almost one-third fewer than three decades ago, when record keeping began.

Matt Detrich/The Indianapolis Star/AP
Firefighters spray water on a large fire Saturday in Indianapolis. An estimated 150 firefighters were battling the blaze Saturday afternoon in the building about one mile southwest of the city's downtown.

When Ken Willette started firefighting 35 years ago, his uniform left much to be desired. Little more than a raincoat with rubber boots and plastic gloves, the outfit was more likely to melt than sustain his job responsibilities.

Now, with improvements to firefighting equipment, as well as better safety standards, and a decrease in overall fires, the number of firefighter deaths has dropped by more than a third in the past three decades and has fallen to historic lows the past two years.

A total of 64 on-duty firefighters died in the US in 2012, marking the second consecutive year that the total has been below 65 deaths, the lowest level since statistics began to be tracked in 1977. The number of fatalities that occurred during actual firefighting also dropped to a record low.

It’s a significant improvement from the late 1970s, when the average number of on-duty firefighter deaths reached 151. The numbers have been trending downward since then, according to a new report by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). By the 1990s, the average number of on-duty deaths fell to 97 and the first decade of the 21st century saw the figure drop to 88. In the past five years the number fell further to 77 average annual fatalities.

The US Fire Administration records slightly higher statistics due to a broader definition that includes some deaths more than 24 hours after duty. Firefighters killed fighting wildfires are included in the NFPA report, but account for a small number of annual deaths.

“On one hand, the number of firefighter fatalities is decreasing in part because the number of fires are decreasing. That’s a very good thing,” says Denise Smith, a research scientist at the University of Illinois Fire Service Institute and professor at Skidmore College. Ms. Smith credits the reduction in fires to more fire alarms, sprinklers, and better building codes.

The NFPA reports that the number of residential fires dropped from about 723,000 in 1977 to 370,000 in 2011.

Yet the sharp decrease in the number of line-of-duty firefighter deaths is disproportionate to the number of fires, Smith says, meaning there are other causes at work. Smith and others credit the fire industry with making a concerted effort to address on-duty deaths during the past decade. In 2002, the US Fire Administration set a goal of reducing the number of line-of-duty deaths by 50 percent during the next decade. Industry groups like the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation and National Volunteer Fire Council started programs in support of the goal.

In 2004, the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation gathered the major industry associations for a life safety summit that resulted in the “Everyone Goes Home” program. It created 16 initiatives to reduce firefighter deaths, which were widely adopted by fire departments across the country. In 2006 they started a seat belt pledge to address the high number of firefighters who died in vehicle crashes while on-duty.

Industry analysts also point to a decade-long emphasis on reducing firefighter heart attacks as a significant factor in the decline. Sudden cardiac arrest has consistently been the leading cause of death for on-duty firefighters. But in the past decade, industry groups have started awareness programs and now recommend firefighters be held to stricter health standards, including a medical evaluation before they are hired.

In 2012, heart attacks were still the leading cause of death, but affected a smaller number of firefighters than anytime in the past three decades. The 27 on-duty firefighters deaths of heart attacks is the lowest number since the study began and the fifth consecutive year of decline.

Experts say that in order to keep the fatality rate decreasing, firefighter health will continue to be an important issue, as will finding better ways to deal with fires that now burn faster due to more synthetic and lightweight construction materials.

“We need to look at standards of overweight and obesity. Firefighters come from the general population, and like the general population there is a lot of [obesity],” says Smith, who notes that firefighters who love their job but aren’t in top physical shape may resist getting help in fear of losing their jobs. 

Mr. Willette, who ran two fire departments in Massachusetts after his early firefighter days, says that even though fewer firefighters are dying at fires, fires are reaching "flashover" points, where all combustible materials ignite at the same time, sooner.

“It’s a point of no survival for the firefighter or the occupant. We want to get firefighters there within 10 minutes. We’re now finding flashover occurring at the six minute mark or sooner,” says Willette. He advocates installing sprinklers in residential homes, where the majority of firefighter deaths occur, but says many homeowners and builders are resistant due to cost. 

“There are tools to make the firefighters job safer and people safer, we have to wait for the public to accept that.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.