Getting to the point with pencils

We don’t have hard data on this, but even in the Digital Age, the humble graphite pencil continues to make its mark.

Joanne Ciccarello
Dale King (with pencil) and Chris Bell discuss the placement of the support beams for the house with new owners Martin Sheridan and Alexandra Marks.

This week the focus here is not language per se but a class of tools of keen interest to many who toil in the language field: pencils.

Mary Norris, in “Between You & Me,” her charming usage guide-cum-memoir of her career at The New Yorker, devotes an entire chapter to her relationship with pencils. Her passion is the No. 1, with a softer “lead” (really graphite and clay) than the ubiquitous No. 2.

She was introduced to the No. 1 through a subtle professional subterfuge. Penciled notations on paper were essential to getting the magazine from the writers’ and editors’ minds to the readers’ hands. One colleague, though, had handwriting (quaint concept, no?) that was neat and precise but faint. His markings often disappeared from proofs faxed (another quaint concept) to the printer. 

But Joe in makeup figured that Mr. Faintmark, if given No. 1s, would leave his mark more legibly without even trying. This introduction to the No. 1 changed Ms. Norris’s professional life forever. When the magazine’s office-supply store dropped No. 1s from its catalog, she sought out her own source.

Norris’s book came out a month after a new specialty pencil shop opened in New York City, in a neighborhood we might call “not your grandmother’s Lower East Side.” “Pens are king, but pencils are rising among desk-bound urbanites,” a Bloomberg BusinessWeek headline on its article about the shop proclaimed, on the basis of no actual data discernible in the piece.

Maybe this is a zeitgeist thing that doesn’t need data. In May, an exhibition called “The Secret Life of the Pencil” opened for a brief run in London. Its aim was “to reaffirm the classic #2’s status as a powerful emblem of creativity, innovation and critical thinking in the 21st century,” according to one report.

The pencil “trend” has prompted me to explore something I’ve long wondered about: the connection between Caran d’Ache, the Swiss pencilmaker, and karandash, the Russian word for pencil. 

The company, I find, is named for Caran d’Ache, pseudonym for Emmanuel Poiré, a cartoonist born in Russia of French heritage. He eventually settled in France, where, the Charlie Hebdo of his day, he skewered the establishment for its anti-Semitism during the Dreyfus Affair. He indeed took his pen (pencil?) name from karandash – derived from the Turkish words for “black stone”– a reference to graphite.

Ah, graphite! Centuries before our smartphones let us tap, tap, tap our little notes-to-self, the humble graphite pencil emerged as a significant thinking tool for people with more ideas than they could comfortably hold in their heads. Pencils let them jot down, quick and dirty, concepts not fully formed enough to commit to vellum and oak gall ink. 

In the Digital Age, silvery-gray graphite, pink rubber, and fragrant cypress wood help anchor our ideas to their concrete expressions. It is the nature of graphite to leave a mark. And that is exactly the point.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.