Secrets of champion spellers revealed

As the excitement over this year’s National Spelling Bee builds, a look at what orthographic advice the best contestants have for the rest of us.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Snigdha Nandipati, 14, of San Diego, concentrates while spelling in the last round to win the National Spelling Bee with the word 'guetapens' in Oxon Hill, Md. in 2012.

It may be all over but the shouting by the time you see this, dear reader. Or not.

The National Spelling Bee is on for May 24-29. “The onstage rounds of competition take place May 27 and 28, 2015, in the Maryland Ballroom within the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland,” according to the bee’s website.

One of the young local heroes planning to make the trip to National Harbor, just outside the nation’s capital, is Kelvin Winney of Chinle, Ariz. He’s a 10-year-old fifth-grader with a Tintin haircut – the kind with a little swirl on top, as on a soft-serve ice cream cone. On March 12, he won the Navajo Nation bee, and thus a trip to Washington, on the winning word virtuosa. He’s the youngest winner ever, and this isn’t his first time out.

“I don’t know what it is with me and spelling,” he told the Arizona Republic. It just comes to him naturally, the paper added, much like math, his actual favorite subject. He and his family raised more than $10,000 so that they can all make the trip to Washington.

What can spelling champions teach the larger public?

The big takeaway for me from my own experience in spelling bees (grade champion in seventh grade, district champion the following year) is that spelling in a spelling bee isn’t just about knowing how to spell the words. It’s about being able to spell them aloud, one letter after another, without benefit of pencil and paper to try out possibilities to see which looks right. It would be a very different contest if participants wrote out their answers.

It’s important to be able to say the names of the letters correctly, too – it sometimes happens that one visualizes “j” and says “g,” or the other way around. And it’s important to take one’s time.

I found that visualizing the words was essential. Young Kelvin is a visualizer, too: “I just imagined a word in my head and just try and see it, just try and make it out.”

So is Megan Lavergne, age 12, winner of a regional bee in Louisiana’s Cajun country. 

“When she is spelling, Lavergne said she tries to say the word slowly in her head, then envision what the word looks like,” her local paper, The Advertiser, wrote.

“I can also ask for the language of origin,” she told the paper. “Some different languages have spellings of words that kind of match up. A lot of German words will have an ‘ei’ in them. I look for little clues like that.”

Lingua Franca, a language blog at the Chronicle of Higher Education, recently identified two “winners” in a list of commonly misspelled words: loose, as a misspelling of lose and definately for definitely. Lead, as an incorrect spelling of the past tense of lead (should be “led”) was a runner-up.

We might suggest that spelling bee performances have as much to do with the ordinary business of getting words right in everyday life as walking down the street has to do with ballet. But that doesn’t mean we don’t enjoy the ballet.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.