Spacing out, but just one at a time

A single space after a period, or two? Inquiring minds want to know, but the single space has been established typographical convention.

Ann Hermes
Manson H. Whitlock repairs a Royal brand typewriter in New Haven, Conn. Manual typewriters may have been responsible for some people making double spaces after a period when writing.

Did you learn to type in school back when they still called it “typing” instead of “keyboarding”? I did.

Did you learn to use two spaces after a period? Me, too.

But did you, growing up professionally in the newspaper business, later absorb another rule, about using just a single space? 

I did. But those who drift off into more remunerative lines of employment do not, and some of them just keep double-spacing away.

Inquiring minds – in this case, a group of readers I ran into on vacation recently – wanted to know what the rule is, and when it changed, if it did.

Here’s the scoop: Typographers have been tweaking the spacing of type – the spaces within and between words – since Gutenberg. This is how type is “justified” – a moral-sounding term that simply refers to making the right edge of the column as straight as the left.

The advent of the typewriter in effect turned everyone into a typesetter, as the Web would later turn everyone into a publisher. But the typewriter had no mechanism for “justifying.” Letters on the page were sometimes spaced closely together, and other times more widely. The type would seem sometimes to roll across the page like an inexpert skater who keeps his feet together better sometimes than others.

And so the convention arose of setting off sentences from one another with a double space after the period. But technological improvements from the mid-20th century on, including the widespread shift to the computer for not only publishing but also business and personal correspondence, meant there was less need for this. By the final quarter of the 20th century, the single-space convention had taken hold in publishing, even though double-spacing held on with (manual) typewriting.

In a section on “The Author’s Responsibilities,” the Chicago Manual of Style states, “A single character space, not two spaces, should be left after periods at the ends of sentences (both in manuscript and in final, published form) and after colons.”

A reference to this item appears in the index under “period (punctuation)”: “single (not double) space after, 2.12.”

For a book famous for being full of useful guidance, if only you can find it, this is the equivalent of a 48-point headline. Tell us how you really feel, Chicago.

Feelings on the issue remain strong, however. Slate columnist Farhad Manjoo began a 2011 column, “Can I let you in on a secret? Typing two spaces after a period is totally, completely, utterly, and inarguably wrong.”

And here’s an item (posted as a question, no less) on a Chicago Manual online forum: “As a US Marine, I know that what’s right is right and you are wrong. I declare it once and for all aesthetically more appealing to have two spaces after a period.”

The view from here: You’re welcome to your double spaces, but save them for your manual typewriter. Semper Fidelis.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Spacing out, but just one at a time
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today