What's not to like about 'like'?

Does memory of an old advertising jingle keep people from using a perfectly good preposition?

Lucas Jackson/Reuters
Newport and Camel cigarettes are stacked on a shelf inside a tobacco store in New York.

Last week this space was devoted to an old rule that seems to be holding better than expected – avoiding like as a conjunction, at least in writing.

This week I’ll make a complementary point: It is OK to use like as a preposition.

Prepositions establish relationships: I’m on the train. His work is below standard. The house is at the end of the street. The relationship that like sets up is one of similarity: “He looks like his father.” 

The other day, though, this sentence came my way: “As with any application, this should be tested.” Hmm, maybe: “Like any application, this should be tested.” (Trust me, “this” was “an application.”) After all, we “omit needless words,” right?

So if like does the job, why not use it?

In the bad old days, just about every living, breathing American was exposed to the advertising jingle “Winston tastes good like a cigarette should.”

Teed-off grammarians could argue that “as a cigarette should” has the same rhyme and rhythm. But the jingle was evidently meant to be idiomatic, “the way real people talk.” 

Nowadays fewer people smoke, and in far fewer places. Maybe we really have come a long way, baby.

But like as a conjunction – as in that jingle – is alive and well in colloquial usage. Lots of “real people,” including those with advanced degrees and carpets in their offices, use it every day. 

Perhaps because of incompletely assimilated grammar lessons, a fair number of people seem to avoid like as a preposition in writing, as in the “application” example. It’s rather the way children who remember being corrected for saying “Me and Jimmy want ice cream” grow up to say things like “It’s been hard for Sally and I.”

Along with “as with,” such writers resort to “similar to,” which has its uses but largely falls afoul of the “omit needless words” rule.

It’s OK to like like.

And by the way, does like, the preposition, have anything to do with like the adjective, or the verb? The Online Etymology Dictionary explains that all three come from a Germanic base conveying the idea of “body, form; like, same.”

The adjective, rare today, came first: “He gave his son $100 and a like sum to his daughter.” Way back when (into the 17th century), people used liker and likest to cover, one surmises, closer resemblances. But like morphed into a preposition: It all but cried out for an object.

On another track, our verb like grew out of an Old English verb meaning “to please, to be sufficient.” The underlying idea was of “being like,” of “having the same body.” We like (verb) things that are like (adjective) unto ourselves, or simply like (preposition) ourselves – that metaphorically “have the same body.”

It’s OK to like – and use – like.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.