French lessons in pride and humility

I was a star in French class; in French sewing, it was different.

Linda Bleck

My mother was a gifted seamstress who could take a picture from Vogue and convert it into a pattern. When I was a child, she often took me with her when she went to buy material, and I would lose myself in the huge books of Simplicity patterns. I liked the pictures of children’s clothes – they gave me ideas for the paper dolls I endlessly made. I also liked using the scraps from her work to make dresses for my real dolls, which usually consisted of cutting a hole in the piece of cloth for the doll’s head and tying a ribbon around its waist. Perhaps that was why my mother signed me up for a French sewing class.

French sewing took place on Friday afternoons at my elementary school. Back then, Friday was a half day, so it meant bringing your lunch and staying after school. The class had nothing to do with doll clothes or Simplicity patterns. No, in French sewing we made hand towels, place mats, napkins, and the like, using linen in pastel colors. Every Friday I toiled away, my pink linen hand towel growing grubbier and grubbier as I tried to follow the delicate lines of the Napoleonic letter “N” (the first letter of my mother’s name) with white embroidery thread. I scrunched the linen too tight and I constantly had to rethread my needle, licking the thread and turning it a murky gray.

French sewing was taught by the redoubtable Mademoiselle Lambert, who also taught us the French language. We called the stitches by their French names: point mouche, point d’épine, point de Cordonnet. I didn’t have any trouble with that. I was a star in regular French class.

French sewing, however, was another matter. Each project, it seemed, began with the drawn work for the borders, pulling out the horizontal linen threads, then gathering the vertical ones in little triangles. My attempts at this were shaky, and many times I had to go to Mademoiselle Lambert and have her undo my mistakes. It was humiliating. Here was I, one of her best pupils, incompetent. I watched glumly as, with a slight frown, she bent her head over my work, white wings in her black hair, her silver thimble winking, deftly repairing my clumsiness.  

This was Mademoiselle Lambert in a different context. It was disorienting. I missed her brisk “Très bien!” after I successfully sight-translated a passage in our French reader. All I got now was a tired “Voílà” as she handed back my work.

But there was more. Gradually I realized that some of the girls who stumbled when reading the adventures of Jean and Suzanne aloud, and with whom I was often impatient, could make perfect French knots. Their back stitches were even, and the pastel linens of their napkins and towels never looked crushed or dirty. Mademoiselle Lambert smiled at their work. She exclaimed, “Très bien!” In French sewing, they were the stars. And dimly I began to understand how they must feel in regular French class when the words wouldn’t come.

I can’t say that French sewing made me instantly empathetic. I still liked the gratification of things that came easily to me. I was still impatient. Although I would eventually learn to sew well enough to complete the easier patterns in the Simplicity books, I could never sew like my mother, reinforcing the lesson of those long-ago Friday afternoons.

Everyone has different talents. Sewing is a skill that requires those qualities I have always struggled to learn: patience, attention to detail, a willingness to work and rework. 

And even, perhaps, a touch of humility.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to French lessons in pride and humility
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today