Latin music scores with chart-topping ‘Despacito’

When the song 'Despacito,' by singer Luis Fonsi and rapper Daddy Yankee, reached No. 1, it became the first mostly Spanish-language song to do so since the mid-1990s track 'Macarena,' by Los del Río.

LYNNE SLADKY/AP
LUIS FONSI (L.) AND DADDY YANKEE SING AT THE LATIN BILLBOARD AWARDS.

Spanish-language pop has scored another major hit with “Despacito.”

The song, composed and performed by singer Luis Fonsi and rapper Daddy Yankee, was released in early 2017. Following a remix that featured chart-topping singer Justin Bieber, which came out in mid-April, the song has experienced even more success; it came in at No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 for a second week (the June 3 chart).

When the song reached No. 1, it became the first mostly Spanish-language song to do so since the mid-1990s dance craze inspired by “Macarena,” by Los del Río (which was also remixed, getting a makeover by the Bayside Boys).

Why has “Despacito” become such a hit? Enrique Gonzalez Müller, an associate professor of music production and engineering at Berklee College of Music in Boston, worked with the Venezuelan group Los Amigos Invisibles on their Latin Grammy Award-winning album “Commercial.” “[‘Despacito’],” he says, “tries to do most things for most people, and it actually kind of succeeds.” 

According to Professor Gonzalez Müller, the beginning of the song immediately brings in various musical styles. “In a matter of seconds, the song goes from traditional Latino to traditional Spanish to slick American vocal pop to slick Latino rhythm-based grooves,” he says. Bieber performs in Spanish in the song, and Gonzalez Müller sees this as another aspect that has brought it success. 

“You grab a kid who’s a chart-topper and then, ‘How can we make it more special?’...,” he says. “ ‘Ooh, have the guy sing in Spanish.’ ”

In discussing the success of “Despacito,” Gonzalez Müller looks back to ’90s hits like “Macarena” and Ricky Martin’s “Livin’ la Vida Loca.” 

“I have a feeling that it won’t be as massive as ‘Macarena’ or ‘Livin’ la Vida Loca,’ ” he says. “But it will have ... perhaps to a slightly lesser degree  ... the same impact. It’ll reach that crowd that, now [that it’s on] their radar, now they have this Latino beat.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.