Bob Moog: 6 artists who were influenced by his technology

Bob Moog – who would have celebrated his 78th birthday Wednesday – lent his name to the Moog synthesizer, a term given to various analog synthesizers which created sound electronically. Moog's devices influenced various recording artists and became an inextricable part of popular culture and soundtrack of the 1960s. Here are six of the artists who were touched by Moog and his pioneering technology.

1. The Monkees

(AP Photo, File)
The Monkees posing with their Emmy award at the 19th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards in California in 1967. The group members are, from left to right, Mike Nesmith, Davy Jones, Peter Tork, and Micky Dolenz. Jones died Feb. 29, 2012 in Florida.

Robert Moog, who was born in New York City in 1934, attended colleges that included Columbia University and Cornell University and founded a company when he was 19 years old, R.A. Moog Co., later known as Moog Music. The company produced kits to construct theremins, the small device that can make an eerie, sci-fi-like sound without being touched, as well as modular synthesizers, a combination of sound modules often stacked together in a cabinet which can be used to make changes to primary sound waveforms. While Moog left Moog Music in 1977, he founded the company Big Briar and continued to help design instruments and products into the early part of the twenty-first century. Moog died in 2005.

Moog's devices had profound effects on many bands and singers, including the Monkees. The band's 1967 song "Daily Nightly" is the subject of a music history debate – some say the song is the first-ever released to use a Moog synthesizer, while musician-composer-producer Quincy Jones said he used the first one ever on a song that was released to the public when he worked on the theme song for the TV show "Ironside," which also premiered in 1967.

1 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.